RE: NO SKWIZZ20 Feb 2022 14:04
OMG!
I can't believe you just managed to tempt me into reading this.
FFS!
That makes me as gormless as you now.
You were still banging on about that when I filtered you.
I'd already said I was above £120k when I was flipping (I called it 'trading' back then, at someone else's insistence).
It did not "go down to £60k"
I clearly stated, in UK English, on many occasions, that I banked half of it because I got scared by the amount I was 'flipping'.
I left 50% (£60k) as a LTH in UKOG, which was my original strategy.
It was absolutely the wrong thing to do and I did it when I was still optimistic about the potential here.
The SP sank under dilution I never saw coming in the first place, much less being repeated every few months.
I had to then work at re-growing the loss (not really any loss as I'd still banked the rest - just a loss to what I'd left here).
I did it but it took the next thirty months, when trading opportunities were much less frequent and the rewards smaller, as were my investments.
So to summarise; I took £1k from my portfolio and turned it into (more than) £12ok in eighteen months [here, not6 counting any other trading I was doing during the same period]. Until I stopped I would buy and sell for profit, re-investing the whole lot whenever I deemed the price to have fallen sufficiently. The last time I did that was with £100k, upon which I made 20% to roll it up to £120k.
In a debate with someone one day (not sure it wasn't you) I stated that I would only refer to it as being "(more than) £100k" in future and thus the 50% I 'banked (returned to my SIPP and ISA) would be "£50k".
I've explained that to you a number of times before I filtered you because I got bored of it and speaing to someone whose native language appeared not to be English.
Now if someone remotely clever could explain to me how this twit get me nosey enough to bother making any effort to read and respond to one of his threads when I KNEW exactly what it would be about again...
*cross with myself.