Member Info for Skwizz

This boy sure has tenacity.
But he brings stupidity into disrepute.
Lololol.

Unless you've already signed a contract or have wave energy.
;)

Lol Cinders.
A year after I put him in.
;)

Tranquilo,
The guy who invested drunk and now spends his time complaining about other investors, who didn't.

Despite this morning's heroic* attempts to use the RNS to re-ramp it.

(*albeit moronic)

He, like his alter-egos; Nancy and Ozzy, is not interested in any facts, wherever they may be.
Just trolling other posters who better IQ's provide them with the ability to understand English and interpret them differently.

Lololol.

"I don't announce when I filter someone.
But sometimes I have posted it in reply to one of their posts about me to save them time and effort in future.
Here we have such an example.
What particularly tickles me is when those posters continue to post about me, to me, when they're already aware that I've filtered them (for over a year in this example).
For no other reason I think this accurately demonstrates they do not have the kind of intellect necessary to generate a post which might interest or inform me.
But you crack on.
At the very least you have discovered a way to entertain me.
A waste of your time, but quite amusing for me.
:)"

The bit that concerned me conceerned SDandercon's attempt to divert attention from another future placing.
About as convincing as a sermon from St. Boris of Johnston:-

"On this basis, this second phase of seismic acquisition has thus been paused whilst focus and resources are directed firmly towards drilling and the establishment of an inaugural producing well on the licence.
Detailed operational planning for B-3S is well advanced and a selection process for prospective drilling rig contractors is underway. Sufficient funds remain available to deliver the planned sidetrack and seismic programme."

"paused whilst focus and resources are directed firmly towards drilling"
"Sufficient funds remain available"
"I did not have sex with that woman."
"I did not attend any of the parties which didn't happen and, if I did, I would not have had any cake,"

Haaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha!!!
:'D

I still won't be buying in and have better revenue sources currently.

That, sir, is a lie and a poor attempt to deceive.

I have invested here many, many, times over the last four and a half years.
I was much more positive on UKOG's future potential until the share placings began.
Then I began to see a few red flags which began to mutliply.
For the last three years I have mainly posted what you would call my 'negative' views, but which were views which affected my decisions to continue investing here.
I have seen some opportunities to buy and sell quickly for a small profit, which I grabbed.
Most worked, some didn't.
I have always said I was not 100% negative and recognised that there was a slim chance something might happen that could turn the company around (mostly I believed a change of management).
I just didn't think that was likely.
Having read this morning's RNS, I am still of that opinion and highly sceptical of its' between-the-lines content.

I have also continually posted that I hoped I was mistaken and that the company actually DID turn around, for the benefit of those still invested here (which includes personal friends).

I was only referring to your posts, Stu.
I cannot possibly comment on your personal life as I know nothing about it.
As you do mine.
So, if my personal life was the target of your comment, more fool you.
I've travelled to much of the world (not all, by any means) during my personal and working lives, providing vaccines, medicines, and healthcare throughout.
I've spent three years of my career not employed by anyone else (not counting the two years I ran my own business).
I planned in advance and put sufficient resources in place that I did not feel it necessary to sell my prime residence.
Good effort though.
Keep trying.
:)

She disguises it well, but I think she wishes it wasn't quite so frequent and the returns were a lot better.
;)

PS.
If I were to ever re-invest, it would be purely for a quick turn-around.
I AM 100% against any LTH here (for my own strategy at least).
:)

1) I am in and out all the time, depending on opp[ortunities.

3) I have also been very clear that I am not 100% negative, although on present available facts I am 95% negative.
There is a 5% chance that news may become available which could change my opinion.
I may re-invest at such time.

4) I am definitely (and have never denied being) boring.
Which brings certain similarities to you too, Stu.

All in actual fact.

LOL!

Only thing saying there's not much happening there, is UKOG's own production numbers.

And they are running out too.
Once they finally do, someone may actually sit down and think, "Hey! Maybe there's too many people on this planet for the resources available. I wish we'd stopped worrying about some 15 year-old girls thoughts on how to save the world and started diminishing our birth-rate instead....!"

It's taken on the average at the time.
Someone did it explain it a while ago, a number of times, but I still don't understand it either.

For one thing, I'm better-looking.
:)