Member Info for skid35

Castle.

You need to look at ENET s history here, I remember the famous opening a waiting list for customers clamouring at their door for the uep2025 on availability.

At least then ENET was relatively solvent (just before the Chinese told them to make a tonne of kit, didn't pick it up and nicked the design). Any purchasing professional ticking off ENET is risking his job.

The chair actually gets paid in shares. At the moment he’ll get a few % !

The chair actually gets paid in shares. At the moment he’ll get a few % !

LOTM.

At a recent AGM a private shareholder, dallo on here, took over the running of the AGM after the chair hasn't a clue.

When asked the chair didn't understand the Bergen / new tech agreement, even the very basics.

Another email to the broker, CEO and chair this morning - nothing after now 5 emails.

Really surprised a broker would want to have ENET on their books.

Remember she was a "finance director" who got promoted to "vice president" whilst there was a cfo and the revenue was c $2m.

Thinks this sums the joke ENET is.

At the moment the accounting / finance in ENET is about one day a week, if that.

Donitpanic.

You're showing you do not have a clue, best keep quiet as you're embarrassing yourself.

RP.

The US contract requiring govn approval which is a contract is in this share price.

Mickey. before my current job I have spent the last 20 years each Friday running through and quizzing country vps across emea on their sales pipelines. Even with these companies with AAA credit, market leading positions, the most skilled sales.and.marketing teams getting new logos takes.time and is difficult.

I am probably the only person here to have met DL. After what he said and then what he actually does he has no integrity - he has the worst two characteristics of delusion and arrogance, unfortunately backed by a chairman who has to have a private investor take over the running of the agm.

Mickey.

You need to look to those on this board for a few years.

The number of times we have had a tevet style "massive orders coming" when they really haven't a clue that their pipeline should be weighted at 1%.

Remember - any % above 0.1 new tech are making money, with the state of enets cash and finances I think they will get rid at any price above this.

Lotm.

A lot of posters here simply not having the background to understand RNSs, admittedly deliberately misleadingly written and having to be corrected by private investors.

You have to ask why ENET has to have recourse to such a poor method of capital raising and why such a massive risk premium is required.

Sam.

With ENET s history contracts are always overdue until they then don't exist and are forgotten about with development cash down the drain, then onto DLs new deluded idea.which this quarter is asics.

Rocketing based on what ?

Ekimp, you're missing nothing. A lot of posters pedalling complete nonsense here as they have when it was 1p plus.

Amazing the focus here, rather than the cash flow required from virtually zero business to keep the company afloat in the next few weeks with payroll due.

A tarana order required, a change to the contract moving to a pure royalty model and a prepay - this just pushed the cash runway out 3-4 months though.

You had a curry last night ?

FTSE 250 ?

Can you give me the mobile of your dealer, he's selling some great stuff.

The hit long term goals you have to hit short term goals, which for SOH included the £ run rates of large / medium / small customers. I dont think he's even hit the run rate for a single small customer (ex PBX).

Hull, that’s the point - there is no correct number of shares to determine the share cap. The shares in issue can’t give you this.

Davey50,

Correct - but the market cap cannot be determined with unissued share capital - so more than £3m.

SO what are you getting for £3m. A company with little income, a large cost base, cash flowing out the door, a poor balance sheet to support working capital, customers looking at the state of ENET as a major risk....

This board is amazing.

Someone states known facts and the options, but easier to have a little quip.and believe in unicorns.

Thanks Noose. This is such an amateurish article, no understanding of the exponential revenue to bottom line impact past breakeven, no understanding of products and market niche, no understanding of go to market and channel effort cns has made etc.

But as with these people do buy off the back of these with the authors trading and laughing in the background.

Might be HP selling their stake to Akamai, or a real transformative mega $ deal being worked.