My take - TC25 Sep 2013 10:01
Totally agree with your observations. I hadn't factored in that we will probably have small exceptional costs associated with bringing Dan Balt upto speed for large Monjassa contract towards end H1. That would probably be best taken at the interim stage since the big ramp-up only occurs at the start of H2 and therefore revenue [and profits] will be very highly skewed to H2. Perhaps I should have pencilled in H1 profits of £1m to £1.2m for H1 but my reasoned figures for the full year still remain at full year £5.7m profit on £30m turnover – strongly weighted to H2. The key will be profit: as long as we are trading profitably at the bottom line in H1, we have the contracts and traction in place to exponentially exploit our resources and Dan Balt is the driver.
It is impossible to make comparisons with last year as we have divested Rosbunker as an investment and ring-fenced that at a present value of £22.5m; thus taking away an income stream of c£1.25m (increasing) at the interim stage.
The fact that we are presently in the end-stage of negotiations regarding Rosbunker cannot be underestimated since it will either release a capital sum of around £22.5m or bottom line cash-flow of £2.5m a year to our coffers and that will transform the group which is already operationally profitable on all fronts.
Quote from the finals:
The Group's current 50% holding in Rosbunker is now deemed secure and protected under Russian law. Concurrently, other options for the resolution of the situation are also being pursued by the Directors, and a number of attractive corporate transactions are under negotiation, one of which is with a large Russian financial institution. The Directors consider any one of these possible solutions to be strategically positive for the Group's future.The Directors are confident that any of these options will ensure cash flow is returned to the Group by 1 April 2014 at the latest.
Essentially we are trading well below NAV and I am really interested to see projections for the next 6 months which will drive us forward. It was great to see Hepworth Technologies requesting a representative on the Board of Directors – the more involved and diverse the BoD the better. Simon Escott as CEO has done and is doing a Sterling job building Pan European into a major transhipment business. If I had a single concern, it would be that he needs to devolve some of his responsibilities to suitably qualified counterparts and share his deal-making skills to ensure the business continues to prosper. By accepting a rep from Hepworth Technologies onto the board, it is a big step in the right direction – All IMHO.