Member Info for Sid_fiddler69

Possitive sounds coming from the CZ PM with his spin on it of course lol

I admit I have not researched CEZ fully to find out if their mining experience includes Lithium mining and processing,If it does then Why would they want another Mining company involved? if they dont have that expertease and are willing to have some one else involved any ideas on Who that could be? We can produce both Carbonate and hydroxide as market forces and customer needs , VW have been touted/mentioned by KC often as an example,more than one off taker? they will have other sources of supply to get too of course not just Cinovec.Tesla are smaller but! only using Hydroxide as far as I know, How much of the market EVs will they have compared to VW etc? Could they want it all? or part of it? Many scenarios because just about everyone with an interest is close by or has very good transport links. well my two pence worth lol GLA

Why? Something massive on the way level 2

another 100k buy today...

.. of shares sold on the 8th nov and reported again today, anyone know why that sort of thing occurs?

Anyway I thought Dfs before any bids for a company is the usual way to proceed which de risks ,thus making it more attractive to investors .

Do you think some one is sounding out the share holders? to see what share holders might be willing to part with their shares for? Why a round pound? why not two or 3 pounds? or more? I has to be worth more than one pound a share.KC has plenty skin in EMH as have alot of us ,maybe its a starting point to negotiate? still too low for that IMO , but the buys are mounting up today....

1

Hanwa took ages to do their DD on BCN but that was for many clients they distributed too,Iam hopeful we will hear something soon.

there have been more substancial buys lately which indicates ,at the very least to me any way, that news could be very soon ,I we all await that news,next week???

100k shares bought in one transaction, some thing happening?

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/EMH/european-metals-hldg-pfs-update-confirms-potential-low-cost-liohh2o-gj63f2opj4rvyw3.html

"Relatively low temperature roasting at atmospheric pressure utilizing conventional technologies, reagent recycling and the use of waste gypsum; "

The above is from the RNS , it may be a very cheap part of the over all process but any cost cutting is good, I just wondered if CEZ would be letting EMH have it at least at some discount if they end up being EMH share holders.

Just a thought while wait on news, Gypsum from coal fired power stations is used in the making of Lithium I believe, So CEZ looking likely to join with us ( assumption!) will have Gypsum from their power stations wont they? possibly to the benefit of EMH and another slight decrease in cost? just a thought.

its a significant increase in size of buys to what have been bought, News could be soon...

this mornings activity showing interest in EMH , with DD a possibility sooner rather than later (IMO)a few getting in while its cheap.Iam hopeful we will hear some thing soon.

The key prohibition in the Corporations Act for acquiring
interests in Australian public companies is that a person
must not acquire a ‘relevant interest’ in issued voting
shares in a company if the transaction will result, subject
to certain exceptions, in that person’s relevant interest
in the voting power in the company either:
• increasing from below 20% to above 20%; or
• where their voting power is above 20% and less
than 90% increasing.
The prohibition applies whether or not the acquirer
intends to make a takeover bid.
But there are certain exceptions to the 20% prohibition
rule that apply where the person acquires voting power
by way of:
• making a takeover bid;
• members scheme of arrangement;
• the target’s security holders approving the acquisition
by a resolution passed at a general meeting;
• creeping acquisitions of 3% every six months from
a starting position above 19.9%;
• pro rata rights issues or in certain underwriting
scenarios; or
• certain exempted downstream acquisitions.

file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Takeover-guide-Australia-2018.pdf

Now with EMH being on AIM with different rules I am not sure.. KC would know about AUS rules of course and im also sure hed know about AIM ones too, My question would be , Can you over ride rules if ALL share holders agree? This looks like it CAN be, as has been said . I guess it comes down to an offer thats suitable to all shareholder then its all vote yes and vote NO if not, but is it as simple as that ? very complicated or is it very simple?

beat me to it ant, plus this bit too not sure what that means :We have an agreement that we can only own EMH,"

I never understand it when we have a change of 6.45% up yet the sells add up to a lot more than the Buy causeing the increase in SP but then thats only what is shown here, so I can only go by what is shown, and I know its not accurate.

Timing of product to market is on EMH side if we go by all the EVs and Giga factories forcast .

Mr C. Secker does say going back to EXISTING share holders, so I assume he means the big players already involved in BCN .and what price?