Member Info for ShouldveSold

Bully my opinion on this is that it doesn't matter anymore whether or not it was the only option. It was the option that was taken which enabled the well to proceed.
The CEO has stepped down; if any justification was required is that not enough?
One can certainly choose to keep going over the facts if one feels its necessary. No point crying over spilt milk in my opinion.

Druid those are certainly theories which could be supported if one chooses to take that view.
Whether or not boiler room chat takes place here is not something I want to police. I will admit I find messages making a case to buy or sell the stock frustrating but it just something I accept which happens on all share chat boards.

LLL I don't know if your posts today was are a transcript of the presentation or a summation.
Apologies if I have missed the point of them.
:S

After the recent Q&A video, I assumed that would of been the last time the "fully funded" quote would be raised again.

Findme, the withdrawing of finance that WAS in place was explained by both Simon & Eytan in separate videos. I have accepted the set of circumstances that led to that decision & the decisions that had to follow to keep the company going.
You don't have to accept or believe the explaination if you don't want to I guess. Although being as you weren't part of the negotiations, you may have inside knowledge as to what really happened & that's why you refuse to accept the company explanation.
I am sorry this is something you don't feel as though you can move past.

As for anyone setting out the company fundamentals for newbies, I am confused as to why anyone feels that is their job or necessary to do. Why is it necessary to present a case for people to invest. Isn't that the job of the company's commercial director?

Lol Druid are you ok???????

My response was to the message you posted regarding S1 results, although I think you have now realised that lol.

I am not referencing that reply on behalf of CERP or L.K, just thought that was information you were seeking.
I am not sure as to what engineering data you require nor am I offering to address any questions you have regarding that data, if S1 was a success or it S2 will be.

Elir I think you have understood.
I am saying that evidently the market doesn't agree, which is reflected in the SP and the 5 year chart.

Druid wasn't this the information you were requesting recently?

Elir no need.
I find its always good to listen to someone else's view on a stock to help balance ones on opinion.
Evidently the market hasn't be able to agree on your or Zak's technical valuation, so maybe the disconnect is in the analysis rather than the fundamentals.

Today's news might set a new range & indeed a new high although exercising warrants may prevent this from happening.

Ok I see.
Well .55 seems to be the top of the trading range. Its hit that and been unable to make new highs for quite a while. It will be interesting to see if today's news will give it the legs to do so.
Even though it has been the bottom of your valuation range, the market appears to believe that's the top end.

Elir so between 1p-2.6p based on today's news & yesterday (discounting today's news) would be between?

Fjones wanting to read the data you recently found is doing my own research. Taking your word for it is not doing any. Would you be kind enough to reference that data you found by either quoting or saying which RNS's you are referring to by date.
Thanks in advance.

Tully I agree on the upside potential. I will be increasing my holding with periodic relatively small increments which I can afford to lose, with the various rounds of funding which will have to occur, in hopes that in 5 years time, I will see gain a return.
If an acquisition occurs within that time. Bonus.

I am mindful of the years Rare Earth-Cadence Min had to endure the sub 1p journey.

Ocelot I don't mean to burst anyones investment bubble here but let's keep expectations realistic.
Does anyone know of the current infrastructure that exists in Greenland for graphite production?
Does Alba need to build a processing plant? Dig a mine? Will the processed ore need to be transported offsite by a particular vehicle. Does a road currently exist to & from the site for transportation to occur or will roads have to be built?

Guys Alba is too early into this licence to be questioning why the share price isn't 10x higher than it should be based on the news today.
There is not going to be a day shift of 10 guys with pick axes mining & then selling that ore to the local market in a months time with sales of millions of pounds. This project will take years of investment to reach maturity.
A mining major Will have the capex to expedite the large scale operation required, Alba does not.

Ocelot to keep things in perspective, having briefing looked at that company you have used comparatively; they not only have a production licence but have the infrastructure in place to have the capacity to produce that amount.
What does Alba have in terms of infrastructure in Greenland?

Angelsey if it will cost £300M to extract £1.6B of value over a 15 year period.
Would you factor that into the company valuation & relative SP?

I don't know if Alba is currently generating enough income to pay salaries & opex let alone funds to pay for exploration.
Capex is relevant even though some may dismiss it as irrelevant.

And Jeremiah looking at the 5 year Alba chart, what is the highest value its ever reached?

Surelock your username makes this so much more entertaining LOL

Elir, my maths is has always been crap.
Just to make sure I am understanding correctly. Its your opinion that the market has undervalued Alba by 1000%?
Is this an enterprise valuation?

Out of curiosity, based on your calculations; what value would you have assigned to the SP yesterday?

Can you please post the link or quote the financial information you found which evidences this.

Alba appears to have the assets to turn into a good, even great company. The potential is there and the future looks amazing. But I am not losing site of how much money its going to take to get there & where that money is most likely to come from.
A speculative M&A move certainly makes more sense to me.