Member Info for ShipwreckSheep

They'll be back tomorrow on some 2% drop as always..

Would be hard not to break 3p enroute to 20p

Just like James Acaster. Coincidence?

"Share with a following herd wind (often reddit) can do some pretty crazy rises"

Just imagine when Neil enters Reddit ahaha

Lol Yana, switching every 10 hours from "best stock ever" to "worst stock ever" and back judging from the posting history.

Something special about this stock is...that a good part of derampers only do so to be able to trade it (DNP, Baron, drizzy), which, you know, not most people's MO, but whatever, can respect the hustle.

But there's not many (if any?) derampers who really seem to have much against the company fundamentally, well, maybe against the management, but not against the project. Shows what we have.

Not too shabby. All things considered.

Whatever we get into close, what a day. To be at this price with funding out of the way for the foreseeable future, who would have thought? And now that concern is gone, I suppose many people (me included) have no more concerns topping up or buying in for the first time. If LB manages to pull off additional positive RNS in the very near future...this has all the right conditions for something very very interesting.

"There must be some TR-1's coming shortly.."

And if that TR-1 says Linde...? It couldn't possibly, could it?

We've been here before 2 days ago, but...we haven't been here fully funded for the foreseeable future like we are now. This is another level of momentum!

Pretty safe to say it's not the collective retail investors only. Big boys volume.

Imagine they raise at 30% discount and MMs expect a lot of people getting scared on the way up again and taking profit...and then nobody does because everyone believes in it being worth so much more. Such fun.

Which article? What did I miss? This share, one blink and more news out haha

So huge that you even stole 0.2% concentration from them (which in itself would be close to commercial), it's 4.7%.

Means we should get a TR-1 RNS this week given that 150m shares is above the reporting threshold?

1.8 open seems reasonable too, could even be higher, less than 10% added in number of shares outstanding, so to account for the new shares and maintain yesterday's market cap, a drop of just less than 10% makes sense as a start (despite the new shares being added at somewhat of a mates rate)

Doom & Gloom Army MO:

Until 25th January: "They are going bust, out of business by end of Q1"

Until 5th Feb: "The results will be a duster, it'll go to 0.1p and you'll all be stuck"

Until 7th Feb: "But there'll be a hugely dilutive placing, you'll all be lost"

On 7th Feb: "The placing has been horrible, you're all lost"

You're hilarious, guys. 10% added in shares outstanding, for strengthening the position going forward, and placement risk out of the way to make it easier to buy now for everybody. What's gonna be the next doom & gloom MO?

I'm pretty sure it's still the price target from Liberum from the October 2023 analyst report. Only analyst coverage with price target that is shown on Bloomberg, other than one from years ago. And no newer reports on Research Tree either.

But hopefully that analyst produces an update soon, given that Liberum is also the NOMAD, I'm sure he's aware of all the news...

Exactly, or maybe there are. We wouldn't know about it the day after the information on helium and hydrogen concentrations has been released.

Not impossible that there's majors already in discussions with LB and aware of volumes and flow rates. No way to tell, maybe yes, maybe not, but would argue that not having public info yet on majors looking to take over HE1 is no negative, as even if there is that interest already, we wouldn't yet know about it.

"The interviewer has not asked because it’s the company’s PR agency and they will have been told not to ask"

Exactly what I mean, Blubay. There'll be a reason it hasn't been included in the pre-set questions, cause usually if those were all the news, they'd quite happily include that question I imagine and give shareholders more to get excited about. But if discussions on JV or takeover are going on in the background, it'd be a very tricky question to answer and makes it easier to not have it asked.