RE: Shed18 Dec 2020 07:10
Yes PE seems the Twitter herd are yet to break into a stampede :) Jed thanks for your comments though I wouldn't over estimate my 'emotional attachment' to EUZ. I don't agree with everything the board do for one minute, for example I object to the options being yoked to operational targets rather than the SP - we all know that operational success hasn't rewarded us to date. I also believe we have a right to know which deleterious elements have been detected as well as the ones that have been dismissed. I regularly highlight my concerns along with the positives for balance unlike the negative monologues which I have decided I don't need to read. It does amuse me however that there is more evidence of 'emotional attachment' from shareholders that continually slate the company and yet can't seem to extricate themselves from the situation - talk about attachment issues! Genuinely I have nothing against negative comments if they come with a bit of analysis, I pointed out the other day to someone who thinks nothing will happen until 2023 that this is not a safe place to leave your money and come back later - it might not be there. This type of high risk investment can go to nothing fast, you can't get much more negative than that! There have been mistakes here but I would remind those who blame everything but their own investment decisions that they got onto a high risk exchange in a high risk sector, these aren't unit trusts and it seems some are learning that the wrong way round. I do however believe on balance that this will come good under current management whose performance has improved greatly, we're yet to see it in the SP but I firmly believe the potential is at least 10x today's mcap and that is why I'm still here.