RE: MAFL stake22 Sep 2017 22:02
Agreed.
I know quite a few investment companies listed on the AIM holding over 49% of another company so whichever poster said anything to the contrary, quite clearly does not understand the rules.
With regards to the other point, if true, has to be RNS'd as it is a material development and has not so I do not think it is the case that we have a secret deal to increase percentage based on funding the drill bit. 49% will do me fine.
I would assume and expect THC is funding 51% and MAFL the rest?