Member Info for shamI89

I dont have a clue to be honest, most of institutional investors have a threshold and once share price falls below that, they would regardless of potential.They wanted to sell for a long yime but volume was not there and this week volume picked up.

and that is not letting us have a sustained rise. There has been a relentless buying in last three days and they hold nearly 13% between them and I think that has reduced as well but we will find out.

In my opinion restructing debt is conditional upon reaching an agreement with pension trustees, they have extended it last year and company is in much better position now. Current debt to earning ratio is about two which is not too bad.

Makesomecash, cheers mate, think this company was experimenting with bendable screen or something and had to sell that buisness .I am with you regarding Boris Johnson, I have been in self-isolation for more than two weeks.I have tried to portray a balance picture here, right now net liabilities are about 70 millions so out of which these lot owe 45 millions to pension scheme.If they can reach an agreement with pension trustees where company would reduce pension deficit by making reasonable anual payments then that removes material uncertainty and that would reflect positively in equity value.They have been talking for sometime and departure of CEO indicates that these talks are about to be concluded.Another clue we find is that in their January update where company states that talks with pension trustees are expected to be concluded by the end of financial year, which is end of March. It is not without risks but part of me says that pension trustees would reach an agreement with company.

Two years ago they received a take-over bid for 100 million and main attraction for buyer was their medical plastics buisness. Problem with this company is that they tried some new divisions which were proved to be a disaster.Wipac had net assets of 45 million last year and it was a disaster as at one point it looked like it would bring the whole company down and it nearly did. Pension deficit is problem here if that is sorted then we are onto a winner here.

I am not a long-term holder of this stock but have traded it for a long time.My buy price has ranged from 5p to 180.So you can say that I am in for a trade but kind of know the company well.

My understanding is that pension trustees wanted to bring in new management and that is why he has left.I have seen some restrucres in the past a good example would be metals exploration ltd , where new management was brought in to revive the buisness.But all my guess, I do think that we will hear something really soon.

Carclo technical plastics is biggest division of company and medical diagnostic solutions is biggest fivision CTP.In first half of this year underlying profit from this devision was 4.6 millions and they faced some exceptional costs.Assuming that second half is better than first underlying profit would be more than 4.6 million.Optics buisness generated around 1 million profit last year and aerospace is expected to generate 1.4 million profit this year.So we are looking at roughly 12 million profit this year if everything is same as first half, it could be more but I am being conservative.

My guess is as good as yours, in my opinion they should update the market about it as it is a price sensitive information, however they are due to update market on quite a few things.They are talking to their pension trustees and that was expected to be concluded by the end of March, if successful then it can push the share price much higher.Eoy update is due somewhere this month. So wait and see.

Thank you for your enquiry.

We don't ordinarily comment on articles issued by third parties but do understand that the journalist in question has subsequently amended inaccuracies contained in the original piece.

We are mindful of our obligations as a listed company and will always seek to keep investor company and will always seek to keep investors appraised of material developments at the Company.

their IR and response I have got is that journalist in question has been contacted and article has been ammended since then to reflect the truth . Rest was that company tries to release price sensitive information as soon as available. So 40% increase in sale of parts for virus testing kits is true .

Most likely to private investors at the moment, carclo had an institutional investor from Switzerland who held a big chunk of shares in I think over 28%.At one point it triggered take-over speculation but nothing came of it.

Not out I am afraid they still have under 10% to shift if they want to, unless they intend to keep their shares, it would be misleading to say that they are done selling.

Weldone sir for winning fool of the year award, I don't claim to be a good investor as I made my mistakes and learnt. However whole point is that you learn but judging by your comments it does not look like you are willing to learn and that wont take you really far in investment world. Mind you , you are investing in aim and emotions should have very little to do with your investments. I know on a bad day like this ,last thing you want to hear is somebody telling you what you should have done , but sometime it pays listening to others.

Days when we used to witness a 100%/200%/300% rises prior to a drilling have long gone I am afraid.One thing amazes me is that people thinking that a negative/positive voice here can influence the share price.These bbs are here to discuss different aspects of a company, over the years I have come to conclusion that does not matter how hard you try if a person has made up his mind about a company he wont change it. It is blind faith in company/ceo that costs money and people love their live savings. Over the years I have come across many investors who had "faith" in company and kept on losing money to the point where bailing out did not make a sense and they lost it all , some of them could have got out at a profit and some of them could have got out with a minor loss. Most of aim investors have got a really risky strategy and if it is not flexible enough it can put a big dent in your portfolio.

Going through pattern and posts today , some people were pumping it hard today on twitter and here to make a quick 20/30% today, some are pumping it today to get out with a 10/20% profit tomorrow.However some people have "averaged down" and these are the people who would be left holding the baby.A quick glance through RNS and company has raised 50 millions since 2016 and got nothing to show for it.But people are still willing to put their money in this company.

Newspaper is quoting Rob Stutzman and go through his linkedin profile and you will find out that he has been with company for 18 years and has served in various parts of the world.He has been a part of global sales team , so his words cant be ignored.But as you said we need to get these informations in RNS and that would make the difference. Eoy update is due now so may be we will get it.Think, quite a few people tried to contact company today and yesterday.

Company is not making any money , I think.Premier oil could afford to lose 23 millions but they have withdrawn so this project is dead right now.But how would company survive? You guessed it right by issuing some new shares. Private investors lose money, bod are taking handsome salaries, there is always a next big thing to be excited about and life goes on.I think this company changed its name to 88 energy , before it used to have a different name and a failed drill in Morocco nearly bankrupted the company.

It is a quickest way to lose money on aim and is still really popular among aim investors.Over the years I have seen very few companies hitting the oil and almost 98% fail. It used to be same old pattern, company would create a hype regarding an upcoming drill to entice investors in, then does a placing to fund this drilling, hits a duster, rinse and repeat.

Company is already profitable , it was their third division which turned out to be a disaster, as it cost them loads of money and company could not cope with work-load, so it had to sell it at a loss.Other two divisions were profitable and doing well.They retained optics buisness which generated 1.07 million profit last year and had gross assets worth 3.45 millions and it cost 0.25 million.