moving quarters24 Feb 2006 17:31
EKA I continue to hold EKA and am quite happy about its prospects. BUT somebody please explain to them that April is not in quarter one. Management style and honesty matter to me. If the RNS had explained the reason for delay, and actually used that word, I would have been quite happy. If in the first place they had set a broader timeframe for commencement of MO production, then still happy. But to revise the timescale without proper mention, I don't like that. You know, when people say quarter 1, if they really mean end of March at best, isn't it best to say quarter 2 in the first place? As a result, I do not believe them now when they say April. I am going to continue to hold, but will jump if the future information isn't better.