Member Info for Seifert

No. I see a correction coming. I am sticking with £22.00.. Good luck to you.

One needs to hit bottom for a rebound. Do you (as opposed to some one else) think there will be a rebound? That's what matters here.

Apologies, that was a typo! You could have deduced that from the context. ARM is an established presence in the FTSE100, and on that basis will trade more on fundamentals, than on speculation of an imminent takeover. My previous posts here indicate a consistent line with regards fair price for a stock. And there is nothing wrong with a fair price, is there?

Yes, you omitted this fact. Money is a coward. Markets are still not normal. There is too much loose capital chasing too few products. Overlay that scenario over the volatile political and labour issues, and there is more downside that upside in my view. It may not be inherently justified on the basis of fundamentals, but I don't think people trade on fundamentals any more. The markets have morphed into a new kind of beast. Money printing, (fake money) has entered the system, and no one knows what result it will have. So everyone is hedging their bets. Volumes have not returned to pre-Lehman levels. Markets may have risen, but on a cushion of easy money. When government start openly manipulating markets they way they have done, with no clear idea of future consequences, then one must be guarded, to say the least. Taking a short term view is advised. Good luck, and best wishes in your trading.

The annual results consist of the missives that show that the management is receiving its full salary, pension contribution and perks, and shafting investors. That's all one really needs to know.

Many of these brokers are paid to make a market, so they (or a medley of them) are biased. Your only resort is to rely on your own research. For what it's worth, my view is that there is a political bias to ALL at present. The labour climate in the South African mines is volatile. There are competing forces at play. The 'new' South Africa is enriching the few at the expense of the many. Sentimental appeals to 'the good old days' of struggle and an ailing Nelson Mandela is insufficient to hold back the tide of union demands for a greater share of the resources of that inherently rich country. So, look boldly and coldly at the facts, and beware the bewitching moves of speculators who are wont to lure you in to a money-trap!

Does the dividend justify the valuation of ARM, even at these lower levels? ARM is not an established presence, and it will have to trade on fundamentals, not promises of a takeover. When it reaches a level commensurate with its fundamentals, then it is a good time to buy. The rest is speculation, and I am grown weary with that.

A bet on Rio is a bet on iron ore. China magnifies the effect. So on the fence here unless it hits £22. A long shot? Perhaps, but one is not dealing with rational agents here, but machines (algorithms) and trading psychopaths.

Their company brorkers who get paid to do a job, and steam-rolling over retail investors is merely coincidental. This company is run by crooks, the management are pilfering a ravaged dog who they see ailing and are milking it for all they can. The LSE should take this company over, and divide up the assets at market value to the investors. But what am I saying, the chief crooks are housed at the LSE!

The accountancy firms and bankers collected £50 million + in fees for 'due diligence'. Good evening to you.

Unfortunately, money is a drug, and 'our regulatory bodies' are as flawed (i.e. corrupted) as anyone else. They knew who owned these assets. They knew the men. The accountancy firm collective £50 in fees for 'due diligence', like the swine Moody's and Standard & Poor awarding AAA status tot subprime bonds. The opportunity to really clear out the dross should have been Lehman's legacy. Instead, we have this risible state of affairs. Good evening to you, and I hope you can recover your funds. Speculators are just as likely to push this up as down, so be vigilant. And good luck!

Yes, one can cut to the chase, but some people may appreciate reasons for my assertions. What I have basically done is separate clearly in my mind (as I did in the BUMI case) the magnificent assets that this company holds, from the hoodlums who control them. Some people only tend to look at one at the expense of the other in deciding whether to be an investor or speculator.. That is basically my point in being 'wordy' so that people (us retail investors) may learn from one another's mistakes and experiences. Good luck with your trading.

Here we go again!. As some on this board will know, I shorted this stock several times, the last time (to the tangible glee of many!) I lost, as the ruffians who effectively own this company (alas! private retail investors are not worth squat) announced they wanted the whole ship, and they felt that sinking feeling insinuate itself into a scheming mindset. Thus, given my gut feelings and previous record, this is not a miner but a hoodlum entity and, on that basis, I will take a short on Tuesday. As always, I know that people here who are locked in in a higher position are hoping to get their money back, or better yet make a profit. I can only extend the warmest feelings are regards to all those retail investors, and the charitable part of me hope the very best for you. But the trader hopes that I am right, so my position is as articulated, and let's see what happens next week. (PS. I did make some 'predictions' that the hoodlums who own this company may seek to separate out the assets into communist (Kazakhstan etc) and banana (African) outfits, swallowing the former and leaving the latter as a rump ENRC for punters like you and I to slip on. I can only expect the worse from this mob, as evidence expressly testifies that they are not fit managerial material. They are Bolshevik hoodlums, and characters, like leopards, can never change their spots. Good luck to all retail investors!)

Time will tell who is wrong, and who is right. If you are so convinced here, why not mortage your home, sell assets, and buy here to the hilt?! And when I say decline, that does not mean speculators will not psuh this around. I wait for an entry point, and 291.5 seemed a good enough one for me. Do you imagine, just as when you buy a stock (go long) you wait for a level, that the same criterion does not apply to going short? It does. And yes, I have lost out on shorts many a time, as I have gained many a time. So what, this is my personal view. If I am not allowed to comment, and only the 'longs' can, then this board is biased and not worth reading. After all, the shares did fall rather dramatically, did they not? I wished I had a short when they were over 400 p! - Good luck to you, and may the best man win.

Here I am! I am not a day trader, so don't check every day. But I say what I mean, and today took a short (spread bet) here at 291.5. I will do what I think best, and you likewise. May the best man win! Good luck to you.

Your claims are arrant mischief at best, and one must be profoundly wary of buying into this dog. Retail investors take note: this company is owned and operated by corrupted gangsters from a communist back-water. There is more than a fair chance (in my opinion) that these shares will be suspended a la Bumi. Moreover, divulging 'inside information' is a felony.'

I have been absent from these boards, and the markets, for several days for personal reasons. This distance has allowed me to think without distractions, and I only reaffirm my negative view of this company. Mr VladLenin has sagely brought KAZ into consideration here. I have a view, and here is it. Firstly, I don't think that these cockroaches who own this company are going to make an offer. Paying out is not their style, thieving is. What I think will happen is that they will attempt to 'restructure' the company along the following lines: a miner with assets in Kazakhstan and other similar states over which they assure themselves they can exercise some control, and the remainder (or rump part) consisting of assets in places like Africa etc. This former will be absorbed by them, and the rump bit left over as ENRC. You can surmise the value of that by inspection! As for KAZ, I see that as a going concern, and will survive on the LSE. Its shares make take a temporary hit, but overall it will survive, and will be a good traders' play for a few days or a week. I expect speculators to manipulate this stock over the next few days to offload or consolidate their positions. (PS: this is assuming that the shares are not suspended as per that other crooked stock, BUMI). - Disclosure, I have no position at present but, as I expect speculators to push this one around, at a certain point I will go short.

These pay rises and awards demonstrates amply that despite the crash of 2008, and the shamelessness that emerged from that debacle, and the politics and the QE and low interest rates - nothing has changed with these self-serving reprobates and cockroaches. - These are no more than thieves filling their pockets from a diminishing cash pile.

Some shadow (black/grey) economies have shadow banks!. Let's hope this is not one of them. Viva la E'spana!

You should recoup any losses from that arrant buffoon, Rothschild, for luring you in to this venture.