RE: Post Acquisiton4 Sep 2023 12:02
Hi Seplatwinner
A few things for you to consider:
1. oil production is really the key to their profitability and cash generation today, currently running at circa 30k bopd.
2. gas sales are worthwhile since they are under long term contract at fixed price levels and involve processing so this is a "mid-stream" business and hence annuity type cash flow, but are much less profitable - they need to scale this business, but it could be valued by the market at a higher multiple than the oil side, ultimately, as this is a less volatile cash flow stream compared to oil.
3. I believe reserve life is 25-30yr plus, but I don't have the figures at hand
4. $250m annual FCF seems fair at a circa ballpark $75 oil price level, but I'm going from memory
5. When you calculate EV/FCF, yes you are correct in your figures, however note that Elcrest (Eland acquisition) owes Seplat around $400m in financing for OML40, which is now due to be settled around 2027 I believe - it was a complex transaction, but assuming OML40 becomes more productive, this loan should get paid back to Seplat; hypothetically, this $400m will pay down debt or end up in cash reserves or be returned to shareholders between now and 2027.
6. Re MPNU, from what I hear the original deal terms remain in place and a reduced ownership of production is unlikely as NNPC does not have the financing to buy additional working interest from MPNU; it is even possible that Seplat increases their stake in MPNU as NNPC needs cash and the President is a market-friendly reformist.
7. MPNU operated assets produce 300k bopd, mostly in oil, of which 95k bopd is MPNU working interest - this is what Seplat is acquiring (95k bopd); i.e. on completion Seplat oil production will rise from 30k to 125k, which is +300%.
8. MPNU reserve life is more than 15 years as far as I remember
9. We don't know the profitability of MPNU and bear in mind that these are Exxon assets so the cost base will be bloated, plus they are shallow water so more expensive to operate. That said, I think it would be safe to assume MPNU FCF is at least $300m. It could be very much north of that. It could be $500m. We just don't know that detail yet.
10. You need to factor in the debt raised to acquire MPNU - namely the price tag of $1,600m minus cash deposit paid ($130m) minus FCF in the meantime since date of acquisition (1 Jan 2021), i.e. reducing the cash payment by $900m, so additional debt of $300m on completion + $300m additional payment in 2026 given the high oil price as per terms of the deal.
11. Factor in that one year from now FCF of the combined will have paid off the $300m debt for acquisition + generated additional $300m on top. So you should consider a 1-year forward EV/FCF target multiple (it changes the outcome a lot!)
All the above points to SEPL being ridiculously undervalued for what is a large, diversified, and I'd argue operational low risk producer with track record in dividends and explicit intention to ramp y