RE: Share Price14 Jul 2020 19:24
Copied over from advfn... I think this was a rather Good summary...
Barky
I wish you wouldn't see conspiracy theories everywhere. The truth is much more simple. Namely, Blinkx made excess profits through dubious actvities and raised a big cash pile at the top of the market. Once found out they had to rebuild their business and a raft of low quality CEO's came and went feathering their nests and making one failed acquisition after another to try and find the right magic potion. In the other corner, Taptica were in the right place at the right time for their performance division, equally raising money at the top of their market, which unfortunately had a limited shelf life. As a result when the 2 drunks stumbled together they convinced themselves that a combined CTV offering is their shot at redemption and that Ofer would be wildly rewarded for pulling it off. I don't think for one moment that Schroders and Tosca deliberately got themselves into this posiiton but having dug a hole in which they are stuck, they are giving total backing to management to pull out their rabbit from the hat with the prize being the sale of the business and how they achieve their goal of an exit and get their return. They are backing Ofer because he is doing what he told them and by all accounts works 24/7. They know that investor information or interest is non existant but they don't care nor encourage it nor would they have wanted the truth to have come out through all the mergers and lightweight/misleading statements - retail investors should have run for the hills 3 years ago (Seek's dossier) - but now we are in the same boat as Schroders and Tosca because all they want is confidence to remain and the business to be made fit for purpose with the sp taking care of itself when it is. By my calculations, if you exclude the largest shareholders, a couple of large individuals, a couple of insitutions just below 3%, management, genuine free float is less than 20% of which a decent chunk keeps getting recycled hence there is no liquidity and just nonsense price action. If and when the company demonstrates organic like for like growth; a macro improvement; or wins the Uber case, the price will re-rate rapidly. And in the meantime, there's not much else to do but hunker down and get behind the management since if they have the fulsome backing of the big boys, there isn't much more to do than that, however irksome that it means investing blind. It really is no more complicated than that. There is no manipulation or weird agenda. PS interesting that Gdog on LSE commented on his pre trade in yesterday's auction. Retail investors like him with DMA access compound the problem and are just gamblers with slightly better tools. The 150p Friday DMA auction trade could easily have been a screw up by a mug pressing the wrong button.
If you are rational, no-one here has any incentive other than to see the share price boom.
Our gang remain seething however at the lack of trans