Member Info for Scinv_temp

..to speak up. I know there are several of you that have questions. Don't be afraid to ask, even if it is only to ask the "trusted regulars". Let them take the responsibility for their recommendations.

Who baits the trolls. That's terrible, I agree.

I'm sure Burble/Brmuds will explain it to you properly. After they sold. 🤣

Tick tock indeed.

"Scancell says" not exactly an endorsement. And that is actually a marketing outlet.

Yep. Go ahead and do that.

As if anyone cares. Did you read slide 8 of the presentation and listened to the CMO from 47min 10sec onwards?

To further clarify, it will be on you what the company says afterwards. I will do nothing about it. Send my comments anywhere YOU like, as long as they are verbatim.

I'm sure the CMO would have a lot to say about it. But just to note, I do NOT intent to contact them. If you send them my comments, it will be on YOU.

It is going to be the most glorious shooting one's self in the foot of all times :)

You have 100% my permission as scinv here and sci102 on the other side.

Yep, do that too.

Yes, please do let them know. Go ahead.

*has not

Or maybe Burble? How come the "scientist" has given their opinion on scancell's most important data drop?

Hey Bermuda whybdon't you tell these people your opinion?

"Plasybryn23 Jul '25 - 07:35 - 21644 of 21647

0 2 0

Bermudashorts: could I ask your overall opinion of how well you think Scancell are doing? Do you see them as on plan delivering against expectations or perhaps since Phil arrived accelerating the path to commercialisation success? Sorry to put you on the spot, but there is so much noise & bickering on these threads it is easy to lose sight of the bigger picture and why we are invested. I ask you as you seem to be one of the best informed with a balanced approach. Thank you."

Well done Bermuda for having my post deleted.

Why don't you make a thread with your opinion on the results and methodology.

Page 8 of the presentation

https://scancell.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Scancell-iSCIB1-strongly-improved-outcomes-in-Late-Stage-Melanoma-SCOPE-study-results.pdf

And the CMO during the presentation, including Q&A at 47min 10sec onwards. Except she used "unable", when in fact it means "progressed"

Nobody cares about AIM unfortunately. At the very least, you have to prove you lost money first, and I only have 2 profitable exits here and no intention to re enter after the latest developments.

You really are very poor at everything Bermuda.

So cohort 1 only had 38 patients to report on?

Listen to the CMO's answer at 47min 10sec onwards in the presentation.

Honestly, you are the most malevolent person here