Member Info for schalfenplanet

I am off to bed now, maybe blindinvestor will think about things called ethics and whether some bright spark may look at the CMC s about data compliances.

Mouse , I would like him to name his company, linking means nothing.

He quick to tell everyone he been insulted but not quick to apologise to you...........really casts doubts on his creditability.

I believe I have not insulted you, but you have insulted our mouse.

All I have said is that I do not trust you, I find that you are not transparent and I would love to talk to one of your claimants that you represent:)

mouse , regardless of share amounts we are all in this together. I am no gambler but I do like to mitigate risk and I believe the way Gary Jennings is operating is a really awesome sign. Lets face it he turned round 3 financial companies .

As for blindinvestor don't worry, I will not forget him I am sure there is a potential breach in his paperwork just need a claimant to contact me

mouse, we are in uncertain times with investors screaming for amigo to start announcing lending. Amigo is a grave risk balancing on a decision from whoever and speculative thinking from investors.

I think we have to settle down a bit and trust Gary Jennings. lets start with the basic first and move on up if the stars dictate.
For transparency I have 184,000 shares . I am all in

mouse , blindinvestors business standards would be a question of ethics if CMC were regulated. But it is a question whether claiments could take the CMCs to court if they could prove they did not understand the agreement ( infact I would be tempted to represent them)

mouse I would not want to rule amigo out at 80 pence, but I believe as soon as the news is throu....(good) then the price will fly to 20 pence and then it depends on the confidence of share holders buying in

No mouse its not inside trading . I am afraid I do not trust him for the reasons I have stated in my last post.

mousekewitz , these things happen . you left for a reason .....it would be truly lovely if we could foretell the future but we cant that's whats make risk taking so exciting

Blindinvester... You asked a question .....what do we expect CMC s to do.

Well personally I would expect standards, not to represent false claims or to make excessive claims on the clients if they do have a valid claim. The average fees are 35% -40% management fees for forwarding (in my belief )paperwork that a client could do is not correct especially if they are suffering financially and I do not believe if a £1000 compensation is awarded that you should be taking £350-£400 for what 10-20 minutes work per case ?

I mean you quote £100k that you have taken from amigo. well max before tax is £40,000 to you .That's £40,000 approximately maximum you have taken from people that are struggling financially, which you knew first hand.

You also stated that maybe you should take someone court at the beginning of this thread for expressing his opinion or did I read that wrong?

You claim to be a knowledgeable resource, I am afraid I have my doubts about your morals ,and your ethics and your advice ........one of the reasons is you did not answer my questions.............I am struggling with your transparency.
Questions asked 1/ do you vet your clients and their claims
2/what company do you run
or do ask one more question which is do you not think there I a conflict of interest ?

I just thought I would like to be transparent with you.

thaw, I agree with your statement that CMCs should have action taken against them by the board but not your reasons why you support your statements.

CMC s should be given the costs for each fraudulent claim that they have represented. the costs should start from the customer service agent right the way through to the legal advice . Then the cost of litigation and compensation should also be included.

There is also a moral point, which is charging customers for forwarding paperwork 30-40% who have a valid claim is questionable in my view. For instance taking 40% from an example of £1000 compensation equals £400 .

My question is blind you state run a cmc, do you vet your clients and their claim first ?

Unfortunately and very sadly blindinvestor has disclosed that he/ she is involved with a cmc. At the same time a member of amigo share chat.....very unprofessional in my mind infact my belief cowardly.

Does anyone know when the next AGM is?

Tell you what blindinvestor , just be courageously old chap/young chap or persons whatever just be courageous

Mousekewitz bless, please be calm. There not lower our standards to blindinvester, let's help raise his own low standards to our high standards

I like , I agree with statement seamus12.

As for blindinvester maybe you could have the courage to announce which cmc you are with ? Or are you not with one ?

Could be, although I still believe there are some individuals preparing negative news which will cause a quick response in selling

Just be patient, no news is good news. J is getting his team together and also awaiting for the answers.

I've invested right up to the hilt in this. If it crashes ,it will hurt. But my money is on Gary.

His resume is awesome. So keep the faith

I think around the 10/12 pence margin ?

Well if you want to abuse someone over the Web thars your choice.
I have choice whether it's acceptable or whether I believe its unacceptable. In this case choice was given to withdraw the insult