The debate of how best to utilise...28 Jun 2022 13:40
our huge and growing cash pile rumbles on and there are 'pros and cons' on both sides of the argument, as always.
Personally, I'd prefer to see the outcome of drilling Nth Eigg, possibly Sth Eigg and, maybe, skerryvore, too, if they prove commercially exploitable, before any major decision about the then net cash accumulation is undertaken.
Any successes here would significantly enhance Serica's potential production profile and our valuation accordingly to justify the acceptable cash expenditure / risk, etc., and ACW and MF seem to have this in mind, too. Quite sensible, imv...
If they are failures, though, we'd have to expect a temporary setback in the sp, of course but cash will still be growing apace and then an acquisition and not necessarily a current producer, gains more credence in such circumstances, surely?
I can think of one offhand but that's more to the liking of AA's Kist, I'd say and Serica's always adopted a 'Steady Eddie' approach to things apart from their very successful BKR deal with BP.
Meanwhile, back to the 'special divd' or share buy back alternatives. I'd much prefer the former, since the shareholders would then have the option of adding to their position here / elsewhere or spending the cash on something else and most have utilised their ISA's and SIPP facilities, I'd guess, so no personal tax worries involved.
Buying back a chunk of the equity to ostensibly boost EPS has always been a rather lame excuse for it in my book - shareholders know how best to look after their personal interests rather than the Co doing it for them and, anyway, if the group's successful, the eps will rise anyway...
The other reasons are for defending the Co. from a 'low ball' T/O attempt (which I recall was the inference, should it be required) or, perish the thought, merely enhancing any existing LTIPs for the BoD and other senior peeps - the latter not being very good PR really...
Just my take on this popular topic, fwiw - sasa.