Member Info for Salinger

Amazing how anyone disagreeing with him is a “brown nose” or ends up “filtered”. His retort to Qpluse, removed earlier by Mods this morning, shows the real character behind the keyboard.
Brian/Haggis uses the same technique in many other boards, AFC for one where he’s been called out as a ramping idiot.
I acknowledge it’s tedious to read this stuff, but I wouldn’t do it if he were a genuine enthusiast, he’s not.
I shall limit my Haggis comments to his major lies and ignore the minor ones.

People are perfect capable of reading, Brian/Haggis and they know the meaning of “raking it in”. Ramper and liar describe you very well.

You miss the point, it’s not about whether QED can pull off the unlikely, next year.

Let’s make a big assumption that Biomsar and msar lono are complete late 2024 and amazingly they’ve very quickly done a commercial deal. Fact remains they'd only have 1 ship converted to our fuel, capable of using it to generate income.
It’s surely a gross distortion of reality to describe income from said ship as “raking it in”.

The likelihood of QED having 1 let alone 2 complete lono AND an active commercial fuel supply deal by end of 2024, is not high and the poster knows that full well.
Even if they pulled it off, we’d be quite some time before sufficient vessels were converted to the fuel to allow us to “rake it in”.

I am comfortable with the use of “lie” in that context given my knowledge of the poster.

“So QED will be raking in cash and can afford to spend on getting csoMSAR perfected.”

Another Haggis lie. At best QED will have just signed a commercial agreement which initially is only capable of supplying 1 ship with fuel. “Raking in cash”? Just pathetic and a perfect example of the BS this man posts and his ramping tendencies.

I think most see the huge potential of CSO and biomsar if the shipping industry keeps moving as it is.
The reality of getting different fuel blends tested on ships and then made available to customers is daunting and will take a long time, many years if QED history is any guide to future performance.

As I said earlier, all the above is future oriented, we need income now. New shareholders are probably quite happy how things are looking. Longer term holders have seen it all before with QFI and rightly want to see progress now rather than constant promises of a glowing future.

Get the company commercial is the priority, CSO and biomsar can’t do that for 2 or 3 years, Morocco can in the coming year of QED are true to their word.

Vertoro and CSO testing is basically RDI for the company’s long term future, it does nothing to get us over the line in the short term which is what we need and have always needed.
If biomsar becomes a thing with MSC then fine, CSO biomsar has an obvious route to market with potential to grow over time.
So many if’s built in to that statement.

In reality, it’s Morocco alone that will decide our short to medium term success. LONO trials look a long way off with any MSC commercial decision late next year at best imo.

“Playground flirting”? Not sure I know what that means tbh, but obviously not a compliment and bordering on personal. Not that I mind, I’m not sensitive that way.

I don’t know you’re history gribbler but Haggis/Briansmith1000000 is not just another poster. His history is well known to long term holders and won’t be forgotten in a hurry.
I value good accurate posting but he is not that. He misrepresents deliberately to suit his own agenda. He ridiculed a chartist then proceeded to post his own chart with predictions.
Anyway, in short he’s here on this board hoping he can recreate what he had before when/if QED get moving.
I will continue to point out his BS as I’ve done consistently. Might not be exciting to read but you mention balance? That’s what balance looks like and yes, sometimes it’s personal because it is. I well remember how he ran these boards like the Pied piper encouraging everyone to buy or not to sell etc, all the while he was filling his own boots. Personal? Maybe but relevant I think.

That response tells you he does read the “filtered” posts. You get the treatment you deserve Brian. Leopards, spots and all that.

This tells us what exactly, Leandra hasn't snuck off under cover of darkness. Desperado.

Ah well, your “bullish short term triangle” will give you another opportunity to sell, Haggis. Also, you do a great impression of a chartist for a “non-Chartist” like yourself.

So much of our discussions on forums is subjective, we each have our opinions. However, Jason’s comment regarding the ii redemption requirements is a clear case of BS. At the agm he told worried shareholders that these ii sales were driven solely by market pressures and resemptions, nothing whatever to do with company performance, his words.

However, the ii concerned issued their annual report which stated quite clearly that they had sold QFI and other stocks due to their lack of performance. JM also states that they were in touch with said ii’s. The inference is clear; ii’s told QFI their sale had nowt to do with company performance.
The exact opposite to what they told their own shareholders on an RNS. Which one is the truth? I can guess and it’s rather obvious.

QED need to deliver real commercial progress before “excitement” is a word I would use to describe how I feel about them.
As Rob said, 2 years since the JDA was signed and still “talking” to possible fuel suppliers. Doesn’t suggest a clamour of producers eager to supply MSC does it?

The revenues referred to by Jason is likely to be from a licence agreement (possible small signing fee) and the sale of an MMU. Not a lot, but would qualify as income during the period concerned.

“Months ago, when this was at about 2p, I posted to say that it was going to 1p.”

Not true chumpsky, it was well under 2p at the time. You were an idiot then, and nothing has changed.

“As the MSC Leandra is now in dry dock for 2-3 weeks(?), QED must be getting on with the PoC fuel production and getting delivery arranged.”

Your above comment Haggis is not a suggestion or guess but a statement of fact. You’re simply wrong but the funny part is watching you spin a load of garbage to make an excuse for your lack of basic knowledge. As you say, LOL.

What meds are you on Haggis, seriously? Suggest you read the company announcements to market for a basic understanding of your investment.

Fuel supply has not yet been agreed let alone production started, and QED are most certainly not manufacturing PoC volumes, you’re imagining things again! Fuel supply contracts won’t be in place until H2 earliest, perhaps even beyond that.

Embarrassing post tbh Brian/Haggis

Utter BS Haggis. The vessel is doing exactly what we’ve been told via RNS she would do. Sometimes wonder you’re not the brightest star in the sky.

How do you know MSC bought Leandra “sneakily”? You can’t include the purchase price in their msar “investment”. MSC will use that ship and her sister ship regardless of what fuel they burn. Leandras purchase saves some money and perhaps a little time. Absolutely nothing on the scale Brian/Haggis blabbers on about.

Just for the record, Haggis doesn’t know whether PJ promotes msar/biomsar, he’s not got a clue, just making it up.

If QFI are to make it this year then they have to change the habit of a lifetime, which is why the SP sits at current levels despite the obvious potential.

Yet again another misleading garbage post. MSC have no intention of rolling biomsar across their fleet anytime soon.
Brian/Haggis knows this of course but insists on creating noise.
Expensive biofuels are being, and will be, used for specific customers looking to lower their carbon footprint. It’s the customer who picks up the extra cost, not MSC and this market is fledgling at the moment and needs to grow considerably for biomsar or any other biofuel to take a notable share of global sea trade.