Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Treasury share have no value, What an absolute load of rubbish, they can be used for acquisitions or can be sod back not the
market at market value, to say anything else is ridiculous. So you are telling me they buy back shares, put them not treasury , then they are worthless. Have not seen ore ridiculous quotes for a long time, apart from the replies to Canute.
Lawrence13 if an offer comes in, it goes to the board, the board either reject it out of hand, reject it but, advise it is in the ballpark, so advise the company to increase offer, or recommend it and then its put to shareholders, it normally needs about 80% to e accepted, and I think if they get to a certain percentage maybe 90 or 95% they can say it is unconditional, in certain circumstances they can compulsory buy any that did not agree. Vey very unlikely that there is even talks as these have to be made public via a R.N.S. Irc I am sure that there is a certain date which if not completed can be stopped. We use be getting close. As for 29.9% in certain circumstances people are allowed approval from the takeover panel to hold more than 30% Mike ashley has about 60% plus in Sports direct
He will be relishing this, Anybody who debates with him, is as, deranged as him.
Thanks for the info on Kenj, have to admit, I didnt want to post this but, I wondered whether he had succombed to covid or somethng.
How they start breeding, with just a whiff of downside in the share price.
bumblebee1. Join your mates on the naught step, and no you are not getting off, anytime soon.
Freddie2 I agree, but results september 1st have to be turning point. Even if I do to get the money I am hoping for I will have a top up before results.
Why do people constantly blame the bod for the share price, they do not control the share price.
What they do control is the production, so lets just hope the results on september 1st are a step in the right direction. They SHOULD, be starting to get better and after second oxidisation plant opened before the ramp up n second half ( hopefully )
stockman00 all the add companies were down the nasdaq last friday. Knee jerk reaction. And todays start follows the negative finish. Hopefully nasdaq will start positive and pull us back up.
Lawrence13 there is again, in my opinion NIL chance of reaching £5 per share. That would be a company worth 25 Billion and that is not happening. I am an optimist, but no where near that optimistic.
Lawrence13 you have so many conspiracy theories, Strukhov, was instrumental in helping get Pavel kicked out, and then you suggest Pavel then sells IRC to him for a pittance !!!!. Personally I havent heard anything more ridiculous for a long time. I will put a caveat that if that scenario does happen to be correct, I will arrange to come and meet you in person and buy you lunch and drinks as an apology for getting it wrong. I still maintain, I dont think Strukhov, will attempt to buy Pog, I think he wants his concentrate processed, at better than market rates, and I d feel he might like a merger. !!!! All speculation on my behalf.
I hate this apple mac and its auto correct, that is nearly always wrong. !!!! massively not passively, shorters not shooters, and apologies for any mistakes from this bloody laptop.
Freddie2, there is very little a company or bod can do to stop a share price slide apart from Deliver a better performance.
I remember years and years ago, Alan Sugar taking Amstrad private, because he said the stockmarket didn't like him and were undervaluing the company. I also remember a company decades ago that was shorted to nearly extinction, it was one of the big car producers, I think it was VW but could be wrong. All of a sudden there was a deal which came out of the blue the share price jumped passively and the shooters were burned.
Everybody on here seems to think that its Strukhov causing this, I have another theory, and that theory is, that this stock has been shorted for years and years. I believe that there are also automatic trades ben fed into the market designed to take out stop losses etc and total the price low. This COULD be, to allow the shorter to close their short. Now that is a theory only, I could be wide of the mark, but, if they were ver going to close this short, they need to do it when the volumes are low like they are now.
I will openly admit, I did NOT, see the price drifting so low, but then I didn't expect such a reduction in production. Personally I would expect them to ramp up production in the second half, then try to tell us what a good job they have done to beat their modest expectations, just like Pavel did a few years ago. I could be wrong, because these are only my thoughts, but, personally I see a lt more upside, than downside, it is still my intention to purchase more of these the the money I am expecting comes in.
This is being deliberately brought down, it is about 9 of the last 11 days the closing SP has been BELOW the prevailing SP at the close. This is done by having automatic trades below the prevailing SP, As they are not triggered during the day they are being matched up at te end of the day. This is NOT a co-incidence, I mentioned it over a week ago and it has continued. 19.09 Bid: 19.13 Ask: 19.17 Change: -0.20 (-1.04%) It is no co-incidence tat this has been done when the volumes have bee paltry. We need some good news to get the volumes up and change the trend.
Freddie13, where does it state in my post I was defending them. ??? I merely stated facts. Another fact is the first halp production was shocking !!!!! There is absolutey no doubt about that.
I do remember one time when Pavel was at the helm production was very poor, they ramped up production in the second half. No reason why they cant do that this to "meet" their poor targets anyway.
denp
Lawrence13 the reason why gold production fell 39% has been well stated n the accounts, the fact they did not have enough third party concentrate and the fact that we only had one flotation plant up and running. Both of these have been rectified so should not be an issue in 2nd half. There should be NO EXCUSES in the 2nd half, and a radically different performance then, which will have an upward effect on the share price.
I have money coming soon, if it comes whilst share price is low, I will be topping up.
Lawrence13 I a concerned about the drop in share price, but as I tried to show POG is not unique i n being a goldie that has fallen n value.
I dont see a letter to other shareholders being essential, as I would suggest the the response would be " shares can go down as well as up" which is the warning any retail investor should be given .
Lawrence13 sometimes if a person guys a large amount of shares thy have to pay a premium. !!!
If there was ANYTHING afoot, the company would have to issue an RNS, personally I do think strukhov would like to merge the businesses, or at least get a favourable price for his concentrate, BUT, he needs us more than we need him. All my opinion.
Lawrence13 sometimes if a person guys a large amount of shares thy have to pay a premium. !!!
If there was ANYTHING afoot, the company would have to issue an RNS, personally I do think strukhov would like to merge the businesses, or at least get a favourable price for his concentrate, BUT, he needs us more than we need him.
must admit rbrand, I have to agree with you on this one.
Fish and chips together ...... Yummy, No tomato sauce. !!!!!