Member Info for roses

I see my post on Rampers was removed while the one from uncanny about derampers is still there.

All it said was
Rampers out In force today.

Why won’t they answer simple questions

Why won’t they back up their claims with a quotes from company rns’s

Uncanny - why do insist on ignoring the 'make whole ' clause which has now triggered and as has been shown makes their effective purchase price 0.305p.

If they are selling now they are still selling at a price which is 25% higher than what they paid.

Some would say easy money, others would call it something else !

A "make whole amount" provision shall apply to the first tranche of the Convertible Funds such that the subscription price for the £500,000 tranche shall be reduced in the event that the Company's share price declines in the period to the issuance of the first tranche. This is to be calculated by multiplying the stock performance of the Company (expressed as a percentage) by £1,000,000.

Uncanny - it will be people just like you, who don’t understand the financing arrangement and it’s implications.

Uncanny - can you not read, or you being purposely ignorant ?

Uncanny - let’s go through your alternative ‘facts’ one by one shall we.

You have to admit, if it were possible, shorting val would have been one of the most profitable and reliable trades in years.

Secondly, as I stated, the death spiral part of the agreement hasn’t even started yet, from memory that part of the agreement will commence in about 3 weeks.

If you need 150% rise to break even, then no wonder you are posting misleading facts like mad, and your agenda is quite clear to all.

You then go on to say we have all the financing in place.

Well we have the next year and a half maybe two years in place, but at what cost. You will need a 1000% rise to break even at current rates.

And you say ‘supported by joint ventures’. Sorry to disappoint you, but there are no joint ventures yet, only letters of intent. Which may or may not come to anything.

You then say, ‘ all the compounds have thus far been positive’.

Well sorry to disappoint you again but 201 is still yet to show enough clinical efficacy and 401 has been downgraded for. A cancer cure to a palliative pain killer.

Ziquaret - sorry to heat about your losses. That’s why they do the consolidations (twice now). Artificially raise the shareprice while at The same time replacing old tired shareholders with new enthusiastic ones, and then rinse and repeat.

Drac - you have to remember that the proactive presentations are ‘paid for advertising’. They are not impartial and the questions are set before the interview.

Forky - don’t forget ‘On the cusp’. That was one of their better ones about four years ago.

Freddy - well as we have worked out, the break even price for the first part of the placing is 0.305p and the breakeven price for the death spiral part will be determined by the shareprice at the time of the conversion so could be lower or higher than 0.305, but as its a death spiral, the smart money would be on lower.

Ruck,fair enough, I assumed you were talking about yesterdays price action.

and it pushed the price back up

Freddy - it's their entire business model.

One person crying foul is not going to get them to change the core that the entire business revolves around.

Ruck why ? We know it was city financial, and they have three days to release the holdings declaration although I expect it later on today.

Valju -

1. The answer is halfway down the rns .

2. I couldn’t comment on the state of George’s mind at the time of the rns (although in the brr interview shortly after, he did sound like he was about to start crying at any moment)

3. I can only comment on myself and it’s a definite ‘no’. However I can’t see any evidence of it in any others either.

Shying away from the maths and the facts again Uncanny ?
.
My first posts here since before the long weekend.

Although it looks like you put in a stellar solitary performance over the bank holiday !

Should be 'make whole' clause

not 'make good ' clause

Lol, and that's before you even take into account the 100% dilution from the available warrants

Uncanny - as you know, all of the financial bloggers and tipsters and commentators have said that the company saying it was at a premium was very deceitful and bordering on criminal.

Not only that, anyone with even basic math skills can work out that it was very, very far from being a premium.

Come on uncanny, what is the price paid (0.6p) minus the fees then minus the 'make good' clause ?

Woody, when you take into account the upfront fees and the 'make good' clause then it works out at exactly 0.305p

It's City financial. everybody who had an ounce of sense new it was coming, It was inevitable as they had a duty to liquidate.

It's a good thing that they are now out of thew way in one large go instead of drip feeding for months on end.