Member Info for Rooky

Surely they put a delay payment clause in the purchase contract.

Hi Muck165,

Like you no background in science, but I think the main difference is in the way the layer is woven, pre the spraying on of the virus killing substance, I appreciate not very well explained.

Agreed. Cheekboy2

Having looked back to what the SP was at the time of the trades, most of those reported as sells, had to be buys.

Not going to prophesy what tomorrow will bring, as I am more often wrong than right.

Apologies, just noticed its a UT trade.

Excitement got the better of me!

Also a fraction over the ask.

Meant to say, 'Also of course, exercising granted options is not insider trading, knowing something is about to move the sp'.

Also of course, exercising granted options is not insider trading, but selling the shares gained could be.

As we all like a profit, just wondering if the they have exercised now as they know something is coming, and they might just want to take a bit of cash after a RNS is released.

No doubt if the above does come about, some quite reasonable will point to something negative, and yet wouldn't you be tempted to take a profit from 8.8p to todays price.

All supposition of course.

Not sure if posted before, but this is well worth a read.

The link is https://www.which.co.uk/news/2020/09/do-antimicrobial-face-coverings-offer-more-protection-against-covid-19/
But for those not trusting of links, put EVAQ Facemasks into google.
The EVAQ mask looks to be the best of the list, but to my mind, does not measure up to the P2F mask, plus it costs £14.99.

I posted this to show how expensive these masks are, from £22 and only 2 claim any certification, but none appear to be fully independently tested, plus none of them claim the process that the P2F mask went through for certification.

Its well worth a read, as I am sure it shows the superiority of the P2F mask.

Hi Duke-arlington,

Welcome,

As to possibly recommending to friends and family, I have to mention that only once have I ever done that, and it turned out after 12 months being one of the worst sudden high gains to big losses I have ever made, so even in the case of AFC, which as my recent posts have shown, I strongly believe will within 12 months be one of my best investments, it won't be a share that I recommend to those close to me.

Just to re-iterate, it's not because I don't believe in AFC., it's recommending shares in general.

I still think the lack of publicity, is purely down to waiting for the production line to start producing, as if they publicise now, there may be too much pressure, whereas once production starts they can state, 'We now have a covid virus killing mask, ready for sale'.

No one wants to take the slimmest of chances, that there is a production delay, then having to explain why.

Although it has been mentioned that Braveheart have sold into the market, that only indicates that they had not sold to another party via a private agreed deal/price.

A large organisation/company could have still bought all Braveheart shares, via the markets through a best price order, which I think is more likely than the huge number/value of shares being taken up by many individual buyers.

If so, a TR-1 could be released any time within 2 days of RMS being informed, although they would I am sure release earlier than the 2 day limit rule, which as we know, often gets stretched where the AIM is concerned.

Obviously, this is only my personal opinion, as I don't like some on here appear to hint at, have any inside information.

Hi Rebel,

I was not saying that I believed in the conspiracy theories (please re read my post).

I was trying to counter such theories.

Due to the continual conspiracy theories, I hope it's Ok to repeat my post of yesterday.

I mentioned in a post a few days ago, that as Braveheart are an investment company, their investors are as happy as could be that Braveheart turned their investment/monies in P2F, through RMS into a very quick profit.

Many such investment companies, churn quickly, as it sends a message that they are doing something, whereas if they sit too long on a certain share, it looks like they are not earning their fees, that is unless it's such as The Berkshire Hathaway portfolio, of warren Buffet, where his investors know his strategy of, buy then hold for the mid, to long term.

The Braveheart strategy as per their web site states........'Therefore, we continue to manage our portfolio investments with a view to seeking exits where possible', so to me their get out plan appears to be executed (others may disagree, which is fair enough), but that is my opinion.

Investors that invest not directly in companies, but via an investment company, would not look kindly on that investment company taking a risk that might just blow the profit already made, (not that i believe the investment would have blown out in RMS).

No doubt these investors will be wowing (if there is such a word) at the percentage profit, whereas those of us who are directly invested, are looking for what we believe will be a far bigger gain, within the mid term.

Also as Braveheart are out, with the majority of shares being taken by none institutional investors, there is far less chance of that part of the company that is P2F being sold/bought out at a price far less than us PI's think it's worth, (always a risk), which I have seen happen many times, with smaller market cap companies.

Results as expected, and considering the 'Coral' taken out plus the covid situation, the company are looking strong.

With the large percentage of business coming from the USA plus the ever growing (now faster than ever) use of credit cards, world wide, especially by 'card holder not present', I feel that the company has a very good year ahead.

I mentioned in a post a few days ago, that as Braveheart are an investment company, their investors are as happy as could be that Braveheart turned their investment/monies in P2F, through RMS into a very quick profit.

Many such investment companies, churn quickly, as it sends a message that they are doing something, whereas if they sit too long on a certain share, it looks like they are not earning their fees, that is unless it's such as The Berkshire Hathaway portfolio, of warren Buffet, where his investors know his strategy of, buy then hold for the mid, to long term.

The Braveheart strategy as per their web site states........'Therefore, we continue to manage our portfolio investments with a view to seeking exits where possible', so to me their get out plan appears to be executed (others may disagree, which is fair enough), but that is my opinion.

Investors that invest not directly in companies, but via an investment company, would not look kindly on that investment company taking a risk that might just blow the profit already made, (not that i believe the investment would have blown out in RMS).

No doubt these investors will be wowing (if there is such a word) at the percentage profit, whereas those of us who are directly invested, are looking for what we believe will be a far bigger gain, within the mid term.

Also as Braveheart are out, with the majority of shares being taken by none institutional investors, there is far less chance of that part of the company that is P2F being sold/bought out at a price far less than us PI's think it's worth, (always a risk), which I have seen happen many times, with smaller market cap companies.

Agreed, lolmcshizz,

Surely any lease re a biggest facility than has been mention, could in fact point to a worry that they don't expect to shift these units out very quickly.

If these units are ordered as we expect, I would be disappointed if they had more than 10 units, in space at any one time.

Space and stock cost money, so hopefully they have judged the lease sized building just right, after all no one wants these units to be sitting on shelves, metaphorically speaking.

Always tried to be as factual as possible regarding AFC, down to the many over promised, under delivered comment made by the companies management.

Many of my posts have been looked at as de-ramping, although after being invested since the company first floated on the stock market, I have always felt justified in my comments.

We should all aspire to seeing the bad as well as the good in companies we invest our hard earned money in, otherwise we invest blindly on what we wish to believe, a dangerous strategy.

Over the last few months, my confidence has been as high as it ever has been, and todays RNS just reinforces my confidence as to where the company is at the moment.

Everything in this mornings RNS points to a great year ahead for AFC, and yet the sp is presently down.

I never try to forecast an sp figure, as even in the short term of a couple of days, to the mid and longer terms, it is often nigh impossible, but what I will forecast, is that this time next year the sp will be far higher that it is today.

Now that's quite big,
A 30,000 square feet facility has been secured at Dunsfold Park to facilitate the scale up of fuel cell system assembly and commissioning.

That's quite quick,
The new facility will be utilised immediately for the final assembly and commissioning of the Extreme E, ACCIONA and Juelich systems and expects to be fully retrofitted and operational by end of March 2021.

That's a decent increase in staff, even if they are all not new employees.

That's a good bit of promise in forward planning.

You don't do any of the above without good solid grounds as to where the company is now headed.

Bamb,

Re the new innovative latex gloves, they were mentioned and shown on the BBC news this morning, so you didn't dream it.

I was watching with bated breath, waiting for any mention of the P2F mask during the programme, but in wain, although I do feel that until production actually starts, everything P2F related is a bit hush hush.

But I still imagined the impact with the news channels not just mentioning the P2F masks, but doing so whilst showing the product coming off the production line.

Once that sort of news/cover breaks out, there will be no stopping the flood of enquiries, mainly down to both the Government and the NHS not wanting to explain, why they have not put in orders for every mask P2F are able to produce.