Member Info for Rockhead

Hi Baz. "....or the sp will take a big hit." As a shareholder, you're sounding like a Turkey expecting Xmas like Shy. Stick to grumbling. I like you better that way! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=db-Ki4Trh3k ATB, R.

Shylock. It appears that you still don't want to read posts properly and prefer to focus on an item that suits you to rubbish any contribution. My original post focused upon the difference between "mining" and "mineable." For meaning refer to a dictionary and for reading, try Specsavers! Judging by your plethora of posts today, IMO you really are living up to your character: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjvajawasEM Goodnight, R.

Hi Baz. Thank you for the latin response, but take care!.............My post was to Shylock, so responding to it may move other posters to wonder (again) if you and Shy are the same. LoL! Regards, R.

Shylock. Try reading my post properly in the context of your other quotes. Your response is 'off the cuff' nonsense, merely defining one term, when two different ones are involved. R.

Morning Shylock. I have not yet read the planning document, but from your post with quotes from it and requiring that others read it more carefully, you should note that the "...current identified mining inventory (reserve)..." is not the same as, or will be the same total as the "...current mineable inventory..." by probable reason that not all of the former can be practically mined. Whilst due diligence on data is welcome, it is important to make sure that one is comparing like with like. Regards, R.

Hi canobie. I thought you'd already sold out and put it in SXX, according to your recent post? Regards, R.

Perhaps a new abacus is needed? Regards, R.

Hi Shylock. Beware that for you it's not a case of 'per ardua semper in alta excreta.' Excuse the probably bad latin! Just a light-hearted thought! Regards, R.

Morning all, Shylock......."So why they would need yet another Scottish subsidiary is a bit of a mystery." Why such a mystery to you? I know little of corporate structures, but setting up a separate subsidiary for affairs relating to Cononish would seem sensible for the handling of finance monies that will hopefully be forthcoming after planning permission. This would leave other Scotgold assets available to be separately financed and developed in the future. Even a currently, single objective company like SXX has a structure that would in theory allow it to develop other separate ventures. Any comments? Regards, R.

I shall miss Canobie as I was really looking forward to an explanation of his tourist 'plan.' Never mind, if he's put his cash into SXX, I can't fault him there, but I am surprised that he would pass up the chance of something much closer to home like NAE drilling to mine coking coal from under DG14: http://nae.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/NAE-Quarterly-Report-June-2017.pdf Surely a project just begging for a 'tourist touch' or even a canal to take the product to the Solway Firth and onto bulk carriers for shipment. Just a thought. Yayay, what do you think as it's not far from you? Regards, R.

Morning Rosewall. One of the similarities I perceived was personal and financial commitment of the those involved. Doesn't ensure anything, but it does help and one reason why I am in both. Regards, R.