Member Info for RNmyS

Fair point CO!

The reagents have been ready, and unchanged, since last year so it's certainly possible.

From the Q&A: "A large number of Affimer reagents that bind the spike antigen were generated in 2020 and worked on with Cytiva and other partners throughout the process of developing the AffiDX SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid test. The Affimer reagents themselves were not “tweaked” or modified following their initial discovery in 2020."

Exactly

Why does every detractor talk about our 2020 revenues as if they're anything to with the fair value of Avacta? The potential sales from our LFT, Affimer licensing, AVA6000, Pre|Cision, TMAC etc, all add massive value to Avacta above the likes of Nova, who are a purely Covid revenue generating company.

I hate the, "us versus them" mentality, but these companies are completely different and should not be compared in such a rudimentary manner.

Turtle Zzzzz

Anterior nasal.

Say this every time:
Motley Fool are useless, never do anything other than topline, basic research, once even referred to Avacta as a, "Crypto currency minor". Avoid them like the plague.

.

Completely agree Tricky, Mologic have done very well in completing a wider validation study which further solidifies their results. I hope Avacta will do the same. Very exciting for all companies involve!

The s/s figures are not present in the Avacta RNS as they are already known (98%sens, 99%spec) as per the separate validation RNS (https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/AVCT/clinical-validation-of-affidx-lateral-flow-test-cq0zbg851uwxx1a.html). Both the Visitech and AffiDX LFTs have performed very well and I'm looking forward to seeing Avacta follow Mologic with a wider validation study, as mentioned in the Avacta presentation, "GAD is already making product that is being used for verification and validation studies (plural)".

I am of the personal view that both tests will sell very well, and you can be sure that ODX will be very busy making one, if not both, of the tests.

Get us that insider info, c'mon

agree, lolarch

"C'mon man" -_- Very unlikely. I dislike untra-ramping as much as I dislike deramping.

https://twitter.com/EggySoldier/status/1390688916819386368?s=20

@Pennyfortheguy: "Oh, so it can’t be Mologic, as Mologic is explicitly mentioned as a third party!"

I hold a position, high average as I bought pre-crash, and am happy to just wait. I'm sure their value will be realized once contracts are announced and sales begin.

https://twitter.com/downunderfutbol/status/1390687925248172034?s=20

"For me its because its been updated with todays date and full contract given with "services commenced" ;) "the contract award date reported in the Awarded Information Section refers to the day before services commenced as opposed to the date on which the contract was signed.""

updated contract*

Indeed, was posted on the 15th March: https://twitter.com/JimBethell/status/1371506433729126403?s=20

Some rather annoying and deceptive people on Twitter who purposely hide dates to mislead investors.

That cracked me up, lol.

Sold some at 261, rebought at 245, I'm sure many have done similar, news due very soon. I certainly wanted to be fully locked and loaded for the weekend.