Member Info for RickSanchez

Not great news for H2 trucks

https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/transport/board-of-hydrogen-truck-maker-hyzon-votes-to-dissolve-loss-making-company-as-money-runs-out/2-1-1757744

https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/transport/man-seriously-injured-after-faulty-hyundai-hydrogen-bus-explodes-at-refuelling-station-in-south-korea/2-1-1757947

Still think that I am fabricating China as being a threat?

https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/electrolysers/why-is-chinese-electrolyser-maker-longi-hydrogen-investing-6-2m-in-european-rival-hydrogenpro-/2-1-1758040

Still think that I am fabricating China as being a threat?

https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/production/green-hydrogen-will-be-far-more-expensive-than-previously-thought-up-to-2050-bloombergnef/2-1-1758155

You sound like a chip off the old block, wouldn't you say? The rampers and de-rampers will stop at nothing! The connections here in this board are becoming blindingly obvious. While I have your ear, Jeff, let's address this SAF issue. Fischer-Tropsch has been the answer for ages, a simple blend into our existing fuel systems. No need for hydrogen. Now, hydrogen might have a niche role in short hops, but for the vast majority of aviation, it's like trying to fill an ocean with a thimble. I will say that the EU certification framework is a step in the right direction for the sector.

Jeff's taken 'multiple accounts' to an art form. It's a mystery how many profiles are dancing to his tune. I hope he's got a stocking stuffer for every single one – they deserve it! The persistence of this stock-ramping maestro is undeniable.

Excellent entry point.

Can I confirm, you have opted to place your investment on a foundation of "management are predicting great things"? I am well aware of all the "deals" being done. I read the RNS just the same as you. Yet contract after contract this whole year and ITM cannot deliver a return for the shareholders. Actually the opposite, most shareholders are still sitting on sizeable losses at 5-year low stock price. Nothing has been able to bring in institutional investment or retail for that matter. Nobody is buying ITM stock. The only ones that made hefty profits are the shorters. Helikon, despite all the "management are predicting great things", are keeping their short open. Do you actually think they are not all over this and would have begun closing their position by now? And no, Jeff does not have to pluck the numbers from somewhere, that is false information, fabrication. If the numbers are not there they are not there. I have made my position clear and pointed out the risks involved. Take a moment to read my previous posts to get your answers.

Hello Jeff.

Excellent point, troublesome/Jeff's lackey. Please make sure to add the filters to all your accounts. I already have an inkling of your alter egos.

I concur. Let's end the filtering madness, do not undo it this time, for Pete's sake, have a spine.

You have no concrete data on ITM's actual pricing strategy, You're throwing out arbitrary numbers without any real-world foundation. Is that easier for you to understand, less words for you.

thyssenkrupp nucera AG & Co KgaA - up 23% in a month

Cummins Inc - up 93% in 5 years

LONGi Green Energy - up 30% in 5 years

Plug Power - down 20% in 5 years up 10% in 1 month

ITM Power - Down 48% in 5 years

And you still think ITM is the best.

You have no concrete data on ITM's actual pricing strategy, their anticipated profit margins, or the potential for unforeseen costs. You're throwing out arbitrary numbers without any real-world foundation. Perhaps put this as your disclaimer first "Mate"

Jeff, it seems you're projecting your own behaviour by suggesting others use multiple accounts. This is hypocritical. Please adhere to the same rules you're advocating for by using a single account. jzchat and I share similar views, that does not mean we are one. This is the last time I will say this.

You've presented a theory on ITM's projected revenue, and while I commend your effort in explaining it, let's be clear: it's just that – a theory. Your entire forecast hinges on a single deal with Amazon and a simplistic calculation based on the Neptune V shelf price divided by five.

Is this the extent of your due diligence? Are you serious? You have no concrete data on ITM's actual pricing strategy, their anticipated profit margins, or the potential for unforeseen costs. You're throwing out arbitrary numbers without any real-world foundation.

I've conducted my own thorough research, and the truth is – there are no reliable figures to support your projections. These are your best wishes, far from reality.

Jzchat, Jeff will not address your concerns about his 600-million forecast and why ITM stock remains at 5-year lows. He cannot provided any data to back up these projections because reliable data on this scale simply doesn't exist.

It seems like everyone avoids these tough questions, twisting words and changing the subject instead. Things often escalate with personal attacks, a clear attempt to deflect and distance themselves from the obvious and pressing questions.

Let's put this to the test, Jeff.Once again, can you please share your sources for that 600-million figure, which you now believe will be reached by 2028?

And perhaps you can explain why, with such promising revenue, no one seems interested in buying ITM stock. As Lucky puts it, you'd expect a 'feeding frenzy' with ITM's bright future confirmed. Or does anyone else care to help him?

No Laurie, please pay attention? I suggested that Helikon has an exit strategy but let's not forget their 'entry strategy' – shorting ITM all the way down. They've minted money on this decline!

I assume your snappy temper is down you waiting for the "feeding frenzy". What is the term for it "Hangry"? All is forgiven.

Oh, the irony. You're concerned about my situation, while you're still waiting for someone to toss you a bone. If there is anything left for you in that feeding frenzy you speak of. Good luck there chap.

LuckyLaurie Feeding frenzy, what a fitting term! By now, I'm sure your stomachs are rumbling louder than a politician's promises. But just in case this 'feast' falls short, might I suggest exploring some alternative dining options?

Jacob, tapping keys hardly qualifies as breaking a sweat, now does it? And let's not forget Jeff, your team member, the marathon runner of content creation, churning out 4.45 times the posts I do. Seems to have slipped your mind?

Laurie, you think Helikon lacks an exit strategy? Chap, are you're still wet behind the ears?

Troublesome? You're doing fine. It's a shame your team can't muster the same level of, shall we say, 'maturity'. But, you see 'controversial,' I see 'risk.' Standard operating procedure, based on years of wading through research. It fits my playbook perfectly. Play it safe.

Ah, the age-old debate! Risk and reward. Some folks see dollar signs dancing, while others hear the ominous cloud of caution. This board should be an open platform for freedom of speech. I, for one, wouldn't dream of silencing anyone. 'Get lost'? 'Keep your opinions to yourself'? 'F.K Off'

But pro-ITM warriors, your constant barrage of 'get lost's' reeks of insecurity. It's like a toddler throwing a tantrum because their Lego tower toppled. Can't handle a differing viewpoint? Are you funding Trumps wall?

And please, do continue with your 'sub-par, ramping material.' It provides excellent opportunity. My counterbalance, you see, is a public service. Think of it as a much-needed dose of reality.

Troublesome - Relying on the UK government for your returns? Sounds like a recipe for disappointment.

Jacob - ITM is a minnow in a shark-infested ocean. A cheque in the region of 400 million would be hard to turn down. And look at Helikon – those vultures are feasting on your misplaced optimism. They're laughing all the way to the bank while you're stuck holding the bag. Now, if someone actually paid me for this analysis, maybe ITM would finally start delivering something besides disappointment.