Member Info for RickSanchez

i did not expect you to read it, you or a few others here. you cannot handle the truth here, unable to answer simple questions. a clear sign of insecurity. that is okay, you are not the only person who reads this.

aat****z, that was point, to expose a user here for relentless ramping and a history of getting it dead wrong. i have put a request in for him/them to tone it down. when one stops, so will the other. until then, it will not stop.

A review of past his ITM chat history shows a 100% failure rate for at least 20 outrageous forecasts. Let's make next year the year of smart, data-driven investing. Happy New Year!

Now Jeff/Pseudonyms. To all who like the tune of his songs. This is a glimpse into the past two years of his ITM price forecasts. Let this serve as a poignant reminder of the potential losses that could have been yours.

"Back up 100 within 1-2 weeks imo." Jeff @ 75p - 24.3.23 Wrong

"Clueless. Hydrogen is literally on the cusp. 200p by June" Jeff @ 72p 28.3.23 Wrong

"The next few months leading into the summer are game-changing imo, we will test 120 again within weeks imo. Jeff @ 84p 30.3.23 Wrong

"Still stand by my comment about this being 120 within a few weeks" Jeff @ 83.90 31.3.23 Wrong

"I expect shareholders to be VERY happy within the next 6 months." Jeff @ 95.7p 22.7.23 Wrong

"The recent 100MW order and ongoing fulfillment of 200MW orders for Linde indicate positive momentum, possibly leading to a surge reminiscent of Tesla's growth, with a potential 300% increase in stock value within 6 months " Jeff @ 95.7 23.7.23 Wrong

"we are on the precipice of securing a formidable 1GW order." Jeff @ 90.5p 28.7.23 Wrong (Wow!)

" I quote, Houston will be the 'epicentre' of green hydrogen production in the USA. When are we getting the rns of a substantial us contract??? exciting" Jeff @ 58p 20.11.23 Wrong

"Despite the current low share price, history shows rebounds after hitting 58-60p. with past recoveries reaching 105-125p." Jeff @ 51p 30.11.23 Wrong

"Lets hope we get back to 100p by end of the year." Jeff (Sounding more desperate) @ 60p 3.12.23 Wrong

" Im calling 200 by the end of the year" Jeff @ 54p 26.2.24 Way Way Off Wrong!

" Speculations suggest a potential agreement spanning 100-260MW over four years, potentially driving the share price back above £1.50 this summer." Jeff @ 52p 26.3.24 Wrong

"these milestones could propel our share price well past 100 and possibly close to 200 by year-end." Jeff @ 51p 16.4.24 Wrong

"potentially allowing the share price to double or even triple from its current level in the next 6 months" Jeff @ 26.4.24 Wrong

" in the coming months, doubling the share price within a week isn't out of the question in my opinion" Jeff @ 3.5.24 Wrong

"Given these factors, I think the share price could reach this level, around £1.66 to £2.50 per share, by late 2024 or early 2025" Jeff @ 51p 16.8.24 Wrong!

The last one was so ridiculous and recent I just had to stop there. This is not a matter of opinion anymore.

Especially the Hyundai!

https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/transport/more-than-1-000-fuel-cell-vehicles-in-south-korea-failed-re-inspection-due-to-hydrogen-gas-leaks/2-1-1749835

None of you, Trouble/Laurie/Dibs, said a thing about Jeff's semi-psychotic rants last night. Had that been me then your keyboards would be smoking. This leads me to believe one of three things:

You are all the same person.

You are all individually just as semi-psychotic as him.

You are all simply hypocrites.

Just a moment ago, Dibs clearly demonstrated an inability to answer two simple questions, and now you're doing the same. This reminds me of your own struggles with reading trading updates shortly after Dibs. It was hard to believe there could be two amateurs in such quick succession.

None of you, Trouble/Laurie/Dibs, said a thing about Jeff's semi-psychotic rants last night. Had that been me then your keyboards would be smoking. This leads me to believe one of three things:

You are all the same person.

You are all individually just as semi-psychotic as him.

You are all simply hypocrites.

Just a moment ago, Dibs clearly demonstrated an inability to answer two simple questions, and now you're doing the same. This reminds me of your own struggles with reading trading updates shortly after Dibs. It was hard to believe there could be two amateurs in such quick succession.

Https://insideevs.com/news/745570/toyota-fcev-sales-november-2024/

https://www.highmotor.com/en/2024-otro-ano-perdido-mas-vehiculo-pila-combustible-hidrogeno.html

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/aug/18/australia-hydrogen-car-sales-evs

https://fuelcellsworks.com/2024/11/04/fuel-cells/hydrogen-cars-falter-in-swiss-market-amid-growing-electric-vehicle-popularity

I regularly point that point out to you, Trouble/Jeff why do you not apply the same responses to your friends here. As Dibs clearly showed, you do not apply the same standards to team ITM.

Classic response, two simple questions, unable to answer them. I will do it for you then.

Question one: Amateur

Question two: Hypocrite

Dibs, I'm curious about your level of investing. Yesterday, I noticed that you seemed unfamiliar with how to even interpret a trading update. This observation extends to Trouble/Jeff as well.

Given that Lucky and Jeff are the most active posters, why don't you point out the volume of their daily contributions?

I'm interested in your perspective on these two points. Are you comfortable addressing them both?

Ekimp, The fundamental question, one they consistently disregard, lies at the heart of their downfall. Conviction, driven by what they perceive as superior data and unparalleled insight. They believe they've stumbled upon a hidden path to immense wealth, a secret unseen by any institutional investor. Dissent is met with disdain, criticism with chastisement. They operate as a tightly knit brotherhood, mirroring the vision and leadership of a figure known only as Jeff and his many alter egos.

Wow, speaking of childish, jeff....painful.

Jeff, your dismissal of my concerns as 'childish' is weak. I'm an investor who carefully weighs all the risks and with this company in particular there are many. You, on the other hand, consistently focus solely on outlandish rewards, ignoring the very real dangers. Your refusal to even acknowledge legitimate risks shows a dangerous lack of realism. You seem to bend every fact to fit your overly optimistic narrative. I don't share your rosy outlook. Be honest with yourself and accept that. It is not just seeing the stock price over days, it has been years. If you are not reading my posts, again, why are you engaging in them?

If you cannot read the numbers then you take a unfounded gamble instead.

Notrouble, did you manage to get your head around the numbers?

Https://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/28/why-microsoft-amazon-google-and-meta-are-betting-on-nuclear-power.html

*to last

In the previous fiscal year, ITM churned a cash burn exceeding 52 million. The current year's forecast projects a cash burn within the range of 50-60 million.

Forget EBITDA figures, the most critical metric to focus on is the company's net cash position. Given this substantial cash consumption, the company's current cash reserves are projected to be last for around 36-42 months.

Just read the ITM financial updates, it's all there, don't be lazy no trouble. The tax year is April-April. Trading update on 6th June this year and 5 December this year.

Net cash year end April 2024 230.3 million. Year end April 2025 170-180. 4.1 to 5 million per month. Why would it be an 18 month period? Where are you getting this?