Member Info for RickSanchez

Troublesome Your words are like a fortune cookie: easily digested, quickly forgotten, and offering little real nourishment.

Another ITM deal, another undisclosed revenue. Transparency? Not here.

Repeating what jzchat said. Seems like Laurie and Jeff are stumped – where are your brilliant insights on this one?"

It's a simple question. Why has the sentiment not changed, why have no institutional investors piled in to ITM stock, and a simple answer, because the risks are still too high, that is f.k.n it. So then, if they decided to pile in, then they have determined the risks are low enough, so get in then if you have the stock on your watchlist. They have far superior knowledge and resources to asses risk, why not use it. Right now they have determined it is too risky, yet Jeffy and Laurie claim they know better. That is the joke. It's actually just common sense over doubt.

By all means, feel free to hit the mute button if the truth stings. But in the same swoop, steer clear of Jeff's delusional ramblings about a 2800% stock surge in five years. I could sail away into the sunset when cheerleading for this loss-making, cash-burning outfit ceases. Until then, enjoy the green.

Constructivenews, agreed.

Jeff, seriously? The panic selling is ancient history, the stock's plummeted like a rock – down over 95%! You're always preaching guaranteed wins, selling the farm before the harvest even begins. If anyone actually listened to you, they'd be swimming in red ink, just like you. That's way riskier than holding on for proven results.

JZChat's position is far safer: wait for the revenue stream to start flowing before jumping in. Wait see proven trajectory to profits. Look at ITM – deals with RWE, Shell and the Neptune electrolyser sale… and the market cap? At 5-year lows? JZChat and I are singing from the same hymn book here. And it is far safer than buying in on hype. Be real, the orders ITM has landed so far haven't exactly sent the stock price soaring, have they? You keep talking about this 500MW FID coming in three years, but what happens if that deal goes south? It happens all the time. And honestly, your predictions on the stock price have been way off the mark. So, why should anyone take your word for it? This is the real danger.

You want to buy into the hype, gamble on promises. That's a recipe for disaster, and your strategy hasn't changed a bit. You could end up sitting on a mountain of losses, Jeff, like you have been thus far.

My apologies, I am now getting sleepy "fallen asleep at the wheel"

Cheers, Jeff, for calling out my point! Talk about a crowded industry hey. Speaking of heavy hitters, did you see Thyssenkrupp's latest move? Turns out this German behemoth, churning out tens of billions billions annually, is now in the green hydrogen game. Imagine, a tiny operation like ITM, squeezed into a Sheffield warehouse, going head-to-head with these guys. Classic David vs. Goliath, right? But hey, thanks for proving my point. It's a jungle out there, and only the strongest survive. Looks like ITM is getting choked by all the vines.

Techtonic I'd say a torrential downpour from eyes and a nasal waterfall of snot cascading from their nostrils.

Hey, jzchat, while Jeffs and Lauries are out there hyping guaranteed wins, you're keeping it real by highlighting the risks. That's crucial for critical thinking, helping new investors make smart decisions – buy, sell, or hold. Seasoned traders already know the drill, but it's valuable for those just starting out. Keep doing what you're doing!

It's gotta be rough if you're bullish on this stock. The bulls keep getting their horns gored, and they're probably venting their frustration online when others are calling ITM out on poor investor returns. That's gotta be even more annoying for the bulls, because deep down, they're probably just as bummed about the price tanking

6 months ago: down 31%

1 year ago: down 41 %

2 years ago: down 64%

3 years ago: down 91%

4 years ago: down 93%

5 years ago: down 50%

Honestly, it's pretty clear this isn't the best place to put your money right now. Unless you got in ages ago, you're probably not making a killing, and it's probably a tough sell to convince anyone else to buy in.

As discussed, the biggest hurdle is the cost. We're finding clever ways to make our most affordable fuel source, fossil fuels, cleaner. Carbon capture and refining existing fossil fuels seem to be the top priorities right now. After all, the infrastructure is already there, and governments are pouring billions into these industries, dwarfing that of investment into green fuels.

Building a green hydrogen industry that can compete with the price of fossil fuels is a massive undertaking. Let's be honest, most aren't willing to foot the bill. Beyond a few pilot projects, many green hydrogen initiatives are being shelved or struggling to get off the ground.

The reality is that green hydrogen is still a small player in a massive energy market. For the foreseeable future, oil and gas giants will continue to dominate the fuel supply. Basic business.

Https://think.ing.com/opinions/orsteds-halt-on-hydrogen-plant-highlights-synthetic-fuel-challenge/

For us, the cancellation itself was not the biggest surprise, as we have shown before that hydrogen-based fuel is much more expensive than fossil fuel in every sector where it is used. In aviation and shipping, it could be up to 10 times more expensive (see graphs below).

The green hydrogen hype train seems to be running on empty, as its fundamental value proposition still looks a bit like a mirage in the desert.

Jzchat highlights some valid points. LuckyLaurie appears to indiscriminately post any green hydrogen-related content, regardless of significance. The BMW concept car example is a case in point – a limited-production vehicle with questionable mass-market viability. ITM's abandonment of hydrogen refueling stations further underscores the dominance of EVs. This constant posting reeks of ramping, driven primarily by financial motives. Moreover, Jeff's attacks lack depth and critical engagement, reminiscent of a child's argument, somehow he is unable to address very specific points, my guess being that he is unable to.

Not here to seek approval, only to share my opinion. That is why these chat boards exist. If your scientific fact was indeed a fact, the stock price would not be stuck in the mud.

Look, these big institutions need to see the money rolling in. More orders mean they'll finally get serious. Right now, it's all talk and no action. Too much bureaucracy and not enough buyers. Investors got burned last time with green energy, so they need to see real demand before they jump in.

We need to ramp up production to bring down costs, but the government's still pouring money into oil and gas. It's peanuts compared to what they're spending on fossil fuels. Green hydrogen is still pricey, and this makes it tough to compete. That's why ITM's stock is stuck in the mud, even with all the hype. They haven't landed enough orders to really become a major player.

Jeff, a serious self-reflection is urgently needed.If you have the audacity to scrutinise the past pronouncements of others, you must first ensure your own actions withstand the same scrutiny. Since your persistent ramping of ITM three years ago from 166p, it has plummeted a staggering 78%, now languishing at a paltry 35p. Now you just look like a fool.

You make claims of some knowledge into what stocks I own and how long for, with zero evidence. Now you just look like a fool.

Pizza, Considering Dennis's annual compensation package approaches one million pounds, a sum of 50k would represent a relatively minor expenditure. I suggest you take a look at what the directors are paying themselves. The recent buys are not that impressive.

To the Jeffs, Let's be real, this update wasn't exactly 'stellar.' Despite the Neptune sale and other recent news, the revenue forecast remains exactly the same. Many here were predicting an increased revenue forecast, this must sting. Did they practically give away the Neptune electrolyser? Cash reserves mirror the stock price's downward trend, and the touted '230 million in the bank' is now 203. We're still looking at a potential loss of up to 36 million. Where's the good news here? No further concrete deals have been signed, and that 500MW mystery contract is still shrouded in uncertainty. The stock valuation accurately reflects its current performance. It's no surprise that no reputable institutions are recommending or buying this stock.