Member Info for RichTheNewbie

There we go. The same contrived essay again. Assuming the worst case with regards to logistics and just trying to focus on cash-flows which is silly when valuing businesses in a pandemic especially with the obvious short term logistics issues.
If you used this logic you'd be valuing a lot of the stock market at zero because of the short term problems - but obviously that doesn't happen because it's mental.
Wetherspoons has taken a beating, made over 100m loss in operating profit, and nearer double that in profit before tax, on declining revenues, that are a third of what boohoo makes. Funnily enough the market still prices them at well over a billion quid. As they look further into the future. On danl90's logic they'd be worth 0p.
Zzzzzz

Maxage still posting every five minutes with anything he can think of to put people off - check
Maxage still claiming to be invested - check
Maxage still obviously deceptive - check

Probably a good thing. That’s more shares that need to be bought back. The impact has already happened.

eurofil - Sounds sensible, free returns for people who buy a decent amount of stuff, no free returns for the freeloading loaners.

PhatStyle4321 - I don't believe that's correct looking at the FCA data - but see why you say it.
Their last disclosure was back in mid 2017 with a short of 0.48%. I think you're drawing the conclusion that they've sat at that level all this time and therefore just added 0.04%.
However, I don't believe that's correct and suspect they simply didn't notify when they closed out last time (especially considering how much their positions tend to move up and down when active). I find it pretty unlikely they'd have held that static short position for 2.5 years.

Keep watching ;)

To put this into context. A short of 0.52% of the company is about a third of today's volume. That's quite a significant amount of artificial pressure on the share price it had to endure yesterday.

Now it'll get very interesting if the likes of T Rowe Price start raising their stake like Norges did...as they've only got a meagre 1.67 Trillion of assets under management to play with...

That's great but this isn't the Cineworld board....

So now up to 3.4% of the company that the shorts will need to buy back at some point.

WorldQuant added a short of 0.52% yesterday. So there's your selling pressure. Sooner or later the vipers will need to close out rather than trying to push the market around.

And if I had sold every other time you advised to, I'd be annoyed, as this has risen considerably since the lows. Please do bore off trying to advise me. As I say I'd rather listen to the old bog brush.

I've bought because I think the share will rise over the coming years. You however claim to be invested whilst saying its going to fall every five minutes. One of these positions is ludicrous and it's not mine. You're either a deceptive liar, or insane and holding a stock whilst saying it's going to fall all day every day.

As I say, when you’re being deceitful, you continually trip yourself up. Not advising anyone to sell you say…yet your previous post says:
“ I would suggest getting out this before you end up like south coast bather and way way too into this share looking at huge losses”

Woops.

Maxage: right so whilst you're advising everyone else to sell...have you sold? Or are you claiming to still be invested? Doesn't make sense does it.

Firstly - I didn't say the first thing you quoted you cretin...and please don't try to explain things to me (or anyone). I'd be more interested in taking advice from a toilet brush.

Seems to be quite a weird inverse correlation between BOO (and THG) and the FTSE at the moment.

No. As I told you.....they own 4%...cmon it's not hard to just read the RNSs!

T-Rowe Price owns it across various funds such as:
T. Rowe Price Science & Tech
T. Rowe Price International Stock
T. Rowe Price International Growth Eq
T. Rowe Price International Gr Eq Tr-Z
T. Rowe Price International Value Equity
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
T. Rowe Price International Val Eq Tr-Z

Why are you repeating the same information which is quite clearly just wrong? (rhetorical question - just fyi for the hard of thinking)

Ever noticed how all these multiple scaremongering accounts go into overdrive near the bottom of trend channels or support lines. Funny that...

Christ, just can't get the quality of share bashers these days.....
Norges Bank now own over 4% of the shares and that is therefore in the top 10....and they're not the only one.....T Rowe Price International own over 10% of the shares.
So that's just wrong.