Member Info for RichTheNewbie

In many ways that would be considerably fairer than what goes on with AIM at times ;)

Although I don't like the term "in house" as they're not strictly speaking...appointed or retained is probably better.

ODONNELL - how many times do we have to explain the trade feeds to you!? It's really not that difficult.

The MMs don't indicate if it's a buy or a sell. That's just a guess by the website you're looking at based on trade price versus the midprice at the time.

There are lots of market makers on any given share you seem to be confusing that term with the in-house broker.

Lol.
They switched it up that time.
Buys of 141,387 and 54,671.......both flagged as sells instead of buys.
Then drop the sell in of 200,000 afterwards.
So basically no real difference in buying or selling but it looks like three big sells finishing with the biggest at the lowest price.
Properly trying to spook people into selling it seems.

I'm enjoying watching the trading games again.

Bung through some larger trades flagged as sells in red to make it look like it's pulling back......(then buy them back also in large trades flagged red as sells because they're below the midprice).

That doesn't make any sense.

I bought more than all the sells in total on Friday ;)

Looking like they're trying every trick in the book to get shares at the moment, but nobody's selling, bar those few piddly trades at the start trying to entice others.

I do love it when doggo goes on one of his rants about being all-knowing........rather than the reality of being just some twerp who spends his time Googling one stock thinking it makes him smart :)

Time to log off as this will just go round and round in petty circles. I'll let doggo have the last word in silly insults as he'll love that.

Looked more like they had a bad day at school chilston......not a very happy gang today!

The institutional sell off that you invented and never existed? :p

Are we going to have yet another Thursday where Matador pretends to know about a significant news RNS and nothing happens.....another hour to find out if lightning strikes regularly in the same place ;)

Indeed Kierewiet - was trying to think of a way to phrase that.

It could be....but equally the top match on Google for S3 Texas is https://s3.com/
That would completely fit with what Factom do.
Who knows ;)

PirateFlag - to be fair everyone had already done that - including the company themselves in the NAV estimations ;)

Who knows - there's more smoke and mirrors on AIM than when Snopp Dogg went round to Gary Glitter's house ;)

I have been expecting this though, as mentioned previously, as it's not uncommon when things get very oversold in the face of there being no real material change in a company's position/fortunes. People reliably sell at the lows because they base their decisions on the current share price or trend rather than the fundamentals.

We've had a TR-1 from somene buying in large volumes, some of us have been buying in smaller volumes, as mentioned on here, so we already knew there was buying. Only question was whether there was enough selling to keep it down here. I think it was always likely to run out personally.

As for news - who knows - could be that too. Your guess is as good as mine.

I hate that phrase "rerate".....what are you trying to say chilston? (because that doesn't really make any sense imo ;) )

For those of you without live prices it's currently the ask is now up to 6p (and about 5.9p to buy on quote) and the bid price has gone up to 5.5p

Buying increasing.
Can't help wondering if the brokers have been given a large order and have held the price low temporarily to fill it from panicky PIs (or those forced to sell).

You’ve got various shots at out of the park returns from this price :p
In fact it should be well over double the current price without any success. ;)