RE: revolutionary12 Mar 2018 05:33
Sorry I didn�t put my post in context as I was replying to a stream of messages relating to a company that appears to be doing a similar linear modular proton beam therapy machine - already forgotten their name!
My point was this other company seems to have a similar linear design ( non cyclotron) which could have all the advantages AVO are claiming but without attempting to keep the overall machine length short. If they do not need to accelerate the protons at such a high gradient, and use greater length and more modules, then maybe the technology is far easier.
If you happen to be Chinese and cannot yet achieve the super physics of CERN but can still accelerate adequately with cheap modules, then putting together , say, ten times the number of modules that are mass produced over a longer distance may still give you a machine that does the job. Not as elegant but if space is not a constraint then why not?
Getting going earlier with a simpler machine may well be a better business strategy. Mass produce model T�s rather than perfect your Rolls Royce.