Member Info for RevoltingPeasant

UT 127p according to investing.com. Seriously?!

HH and Hawi - agree your timelines, but it is also possible a negotiated settlment could come any time up the start of the trial on Monday 12 September - or even during the trial if S's lawyers sense it is going aginst them.

Currently suffering with Covid so head feels full of cotton wool. I recollect last night's UT was a false high compared with the bid/offer at 4.30, but I can't recall what the bid/offer was. Can anyone advise? Thanks. I just feels that the current fall of about 5p is nothing of the kind. Thanks

Sorry wrong board

St Crispin's day is 25 October. As good a day as any for the read out etc.?

Simon Thompson giving BGO a push in IC on-line this morning:
https://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/ideas/2022/08/30/targeting-lowly-rated-technology-shares/?xnpe_tifc=4d4.xd4Nxfh_xfh_hknZ49psafeWaeiWhFW5adLcbue3aG8Lbj43nkPlbdicauU.EG8.adJSxuQ_bD17xfeu4Dnl4DHpbXTT&utm_source=exponea&utm_campaign=Investment%20Daily%20Email%2031%20Aug%202022&utm_medium=email

Here is the link for Telegraph Edition subscribers:
http://digitaleditions.telegraph.co.uk/data/1079/reader/reader.html?social#!preferred/0/package/1079/pub/1079/page/115/article/NaN

For clarification. The last comment by BT was in reference to the possibility of Samsung making an offer for the company.

Article headed "British inventor Nanoco heads into battle over TV tech with Samsung in Texan court". Sorry, can't post a link as I get the paper electronically and it would be behind a paywall for non-subscribers. Mostly what we already know, but things I don't think I was aware of include:

Nanoco is seeking "up to $500m in damages". I don't think I have seen a figure put on the claim before.
There will be only 8 jurors.

Two comments from BT, one negative and one positive:
"placing the fate of the company in the hands of a jury gathered from the small Texan town of Marshall is risky ... you could end up holding your head in your hands even if you win"
"we are getting to a level of confidence where if Samsung came along and offered a significant premium, we'd say get stuffed".

Suzhou had 180 days right of first refusal to match any further fundraising from 7 March. If my arithmetic is right, that expires in about a week (4 September). Does anyone anticipate any other investor has been waiting in the wings for the 180 days to expire? Can we add that to the list of potential news that might move the share price?

Not bouncing as much as I would expect. .32 to .34 bid/offer currently. As a result of RNS at 9am instead of 7am? Have fewer noticed it?

Of course BT said "we're going to trial" - he's hardly going to say the trial is only a bluff!

Hawi thank you for keeping us posted. Much appreciated. However, I'm not sure I really understand this Gilstrap ex-cathedra. Is it good news for Nanoco? I don't like the sound of holding Nanoco to limitations, but do like the sound of allowing them to address issues raised by Samsung. What does it mean in practice?
Thanks again

NT on HL now. Have the brokers shut up shop early?

I've also reported. We should all do so and get him/her banned. Complete waste of space

It was and it has. Good call Kiwi

Any chartist out there? Is a break through 40p significant? If so, next resistance points? Thank you

As Griffiths reduces here, he seems to be increasing his holding in IQE. Up from less than 3% at the start of the month to 5.02% per RNS this morning.

If there is a business update, surely it has to be released by RNS before the AGM. On the other hand, the AGM presentation , if containing nothing new, could come later. Interesting times.

Has it begun? 102-105 now according to investing.com