Member Info for Repression

It amazes me that "snowflakes" haven't pursued issues of caning etc when they were at school and tried to sue. We still had the cane when I was at school in the seventies although fortunately I never got it.

My wife is a civil servant, and I say to her, "when you retire it will be payback time" . She thinks I'm joking .
I reference you to this Tibbs and request you follow JRM's particular brand of diction when writing on this forum:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49137619

Please use IMPERIAL measurements.

In 2016, he said: "Appropriate, inappropriate, unacceptable and disappointing are those new Labour words that get dropped into conversations and they mean remarkably little or what, in a Humpty Dumptyish way, what the person hearing them wishes to think that they mean."

I will be watching you from now on mrtibbles Esq .

Gippsland – which has since morphed into an ASX-listed e-sports outfit Emerge Gaming. Hmm.

I bought in at 845 last week when I thought it had gone low enough. Sold, but will watch to buy back in, but it's not acting the way other miners are. Think it could go lower, maybe test 730 around 17/5?

I'm out. Looks like it's about to go into freefall again.

And yet this keeps going down? Why?

Yeah, what is happening here, it's relentless

This doing nothing

Hopefully the gold price as now will help (if it holds) but in my experience, in the past, even when we've had good numbers we've fallen.

Courtesy of the POG board:
Istabraq - since things are rather dull at the moment on the POG front - we trundle along making painfully slow progress under the same management team we had in 2016 , I'll introduce a little what-if for everybody to comment upon, if they feel inclined.
What if Michael Gove hadn't knifed Boris back in 2016 ?
Boris would have been PM instead of Theresa May and Gove would probably have been given the Chancellorship instead of Philip Hammond. My guess is Gove would have done much like Hammond and been fiscally restrained but I think he has some added intellect and would have come up with a few financial tricks to boost the economy. Boris would have given us more of a feel good factor and would probably have just pushed on with Brexit regardless. I think we would have exited 18mth-2yrs ago and after about 6-9mths of the EU trying to play silly buggers they would have realised that co-operation was the best course of action and we would by now have 95-99% of all UK / EU activity running smoothly and a lot more flexibility for UK to trade with the old Commonwealth countries again as well as BRICS & US. Most importantly businesses would be investing for the future and entrepreneurs would be looking to develop new products and markets ... all of which is still on hold right now.
By gut instinct is that economically we would hardly notice the difference - no major recession or GDP bump, house prices and Sterling not that dissimilar but 90% of people in the country would be feeling a bloody sight happier ... what do you think ?

Cey should be much higher than this with gold at this price. All the goldies should.

.... still post on here?

£30k. Sounds about right to me. Not £40k.

Or nearly all, and bought HOC and CEY, shares that have done me well in the past. I'm speculating that the miners are just about to take off/have some catching up to do with gold. That's my theory, as usual DYOR.

£4K per person per month? Do they all work in London? No wonder it’s going to the wall.

Not only that, but the Lottery is the biggest mugs bet ever - akin to taking out an extended warranty on an electrical product - and yet Gamcare etc say nothing about this.

https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/woodford-patient-capital-trust-interactive-investor-equity-income-fund-131346374.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHyz98HnBLi8la-MCaKptqiX6MQuVOM5t49HKKzsGvZbRi558Q4E98qFA5JYsD9xV7aSmDlNmTgNHEesLT4lkxKdFKIICFiyeLa9vfsSd2A1qp1bVqN-6m2SXUd_d_RUtaxsmkOLdRbw-JvtRX4db1u-fePqjjurVD_Xffoof8JD

Let's get this straight, it's not gambling , it's losing that is the problem, or are they saying if you win the jackpot on the lottery you may encounter the same problems as losers do? All these charities should not have gambling in them, gamcare etc should be changed to losingcare, but that wouldn't fit their agenda.

That article was impossible to follow.

If they're going to do that they should tax every company that lists on AIM, as that seems a complete lottery infested by con artists. Come to think of it, the main index is not much better at times. It seems incredidbly hard for companies to tell the truth and issue an RNS in plain language that is easy for everyone to understand. Talking of the lottery, will they have the mandatory tax imposed on them as that is the biggest mugs bet of all time akin to buying an extended warranty for an electrical product.