RE: This has Massive Potential13 Apr 2026 11:26
Just asked Ai to make me a valuation comparison of Eco to RKH and it came up with the following
1. The Rockhopper (RKH) Baseline
Rockhopper is currently priced for the Sea Lion development, which reached a Final Investment Decision (FID) in late 2025. This reclassified their resources from "Maybe" to "Will Happen."
• Market Cap: ~£780m
• Cash: ~$179m (£138m) — Highly capitalized after their recent raise.
• Net Resource (2P + 2C): 321 million barrels (110m 2P + 211m 2C).
• Implied Value per Discovered Barrel: £2.43/bbl (Unrisked).
• Status: De-risked. Navitas is the operator. First oil 2028.
2. The Eco Atlantic (ECO) SOTP Comparison
We will now apply a "Farm-Down" logic (20-25% retained interest) and a standard 15% Geological Chance of Success (CoS) to find Eco’s "Risked Net Resource."
3. The Valuation: RKH vs. ECO
If we treat Rockhopper’s 321m discovered barrels as the "Gold Standard," we can see just how undervalued Eco is relative to its Risked potential.
4. Why the Gap?
Rockhopper is valued higher because its barrels are "Bankable." You can take the Sea Lion FID to a lender and get project financing. Eco’s 560m risked barrels are still "In the Ground."
However,
• The BP Namibia deal just moved 172m of those "Risked" barrels into the "Highly Likely to be Drilled" category.
• If Eco achieves just one discovery in Namibia or Guyana, its CoS jumps from 15% to 50%–70%, and the "Value per Barrel" will re-rate from 48p toward Rockhopper's £2.43 level instantly.
Summary
If Eco were valued on the same "Risked Barrel" basis as Rockhopper, its share price today should be roughly £1.80 – £2.10.
At 61p, the market is giving you the Namibian BP deal, the Guyana potential, and the Falklands carry for essentially 25 cents on the dollar compared to the valuation the market is already giving Rockhopper for the same basin.