Member Info for redindi

Maybe. Maybe not. I don't believe any company would resist a generous offer, if in the best interests of all concerned. And as we are led to believe, the company is aware of it's real value so why would they settle for less for the sake of a bit more time? Putting the data info into the public domain could just be a reminder to certain parties, who knows! Anyway, soon it will be exciting, Spectacular Super Douper September so relax for now)))

wouldn't...

Didn't Sophie reply to an email stating SEE regarded it as a personal view a la a blog and therefore no comment necessary? Not that one would have been welcome

And the machine feeds itself more and more every day. As Semicast said in his email to S2020, the management know the value of what they have. I just hope the market recognises it before too long!

Glandore, yes, quite right, the market is clueless as Semicast alluded to. He also seems to be on the same page as S2020. Or almost, either a very exciting or Spectacular September!

Terry And with every passing minute /hour /day the value of SEE goes up as our data bank exponentially increases. Apple /Waymo better hurry up or SEE will be worth more than both combined!!

Phil, don't you mean Super Douper September? Entirely different)))

And whilst Waymo has to rely on it's fleet of vehicles to log up the miles, our customers kindly provide the data as part of the SaaS and with the number of units on the road growing almost daily, the miles/kilometers of data grow exponentially compared to Waymo and the like. How much is that data, and it's source, worth to Waymo and the like? Maybe, there is good reason for this announcement? Not forgetting the rest of the business, of course)))

Maybe today it is but tomorrow is another day. It's also not a full RNS. What is important is Kens statement at the end, market leadership by a country mile. And all that data. What would Waymo pay for that, let alone anything else?

S2020, to get the Big 3 in each of the US, Germany and Japan would be 55 million vehicles as at 2016. Market dominance awaits IF SEE achieve that or close to it))))

Our friend Colin really does not like Viktors latest offering.....

Semicast Research
‏

@semicast_res - 1h
Following Following @semicast_res
More
Dad Dancing is painful to witness. So too brokers failing to understand the nuance of semiconductor design trade-offs in automotive embedded systems. Both are best avoided. #lookawaynow

So there's possibly a low ball bid and it appears that the following are in collusion to depress the share price in order to facilitate said low ball offer - 1. The company and it's directors /founders who for their own reasons prefer to make considerably less money than they would with a reasonable offer. 2. Their brokers following client instructions to keep schtum and opening themselves up to charges of collusion. 3.Market makers who also join in the collusion and suppress the share price in order to facilitate the low ball bid. 4. Private investors and maybe II's who despite knowing of a potential low ball bid do not go on a buying spree. 5. Add your own to the list. In my experience, at the first sign of a bid, the SP is significantly increased. Here, the opposite has happened, there has been no interest, we are in the Silly Season, there has been no positive news recently and Milton are or were selling. Coupled with the fact, the last person we know got exactly the opposite impression doesn't suggest there is a bid imminent. Yes, due to the speculation, SEE needs to issue a response either to confirm or deny it, then we can move on, either way.

But who supplies the system to obtain 5 star safety ratings?

Excluding the airline collaboration RNS, the last positive RNS was the Chinese OEM on 27/07,less than 4 weeks ago. Presumably, SEE has a shelf of RNS to issue at the drop of a hat? I also note Safestocks never had wind of it but still SEE had the temerity to issue it first!! What next will SEE be announcing before running it by Safestocks? The cheek!!!!

Which would be?

Looking at the Safestocks article again, of the five points he lists there is only one that is not guesswork, supposition or Safestocks own view. But as regards CG, perhaps SEE could explain to it's shareholders /owners what we are paying CG for as CG appear to be doing diddly squat at the moment. Nice work if you can get it!!

Phil, so once we get the seller out of the way, we'll be up to 27p? Cool!!!!!!

According to accounts on here and elsewhere, the main employees are more than smart. If that's the case, why would they angle to sell the company on the cheap? It doesn't make sense and most definitely ain't. Those that have recently been awarded shares and those founders already with a sizeable number stand to lose a fortune by taking this route. Unless of course, the suitor has offered them equally lucrative packages. However they are not the only shareholders /owners in /of this company. Mr Safestocks latest article may provide a response that we, the owners of this company should not have needed to ask for as, if I may remind is a criminal offence. Obviously I do not believe in any way that employees of the company have acted in any way other than the benefit of all the owners of the company but a reminder of their fujiduciary duties is not remiss. Of course, our directors are way too smart for that, aren't they??

Arthur, the 77,931 buy at 11%50%05 is mine, sold other shares to buy SEE!!!