Member Info for red_hornet

You said the CEO of AFC, what does that have to do with PHE?

He hasn’t actually sold any shares for a long time, still has the same small percent for the last couple of years.

What deals at HUI are you referring to be? They seem to be progressing well in the Gulf?

Where did he say that?

Castle, instead of blaming everything on the White family, maybe ask yourself why they are selling?

You've blamed the whites for a long-time, even though they have only reduced their joint holding by a couple of percent per year.

Look closer to home and the actual business. If this was going to 12p, they wouldn't be selling!!

Bletchley Park - haha!

Not heard about Stan's book for a while. I wonder if Castle Indian edition every turned up?

15LIVES - what's your view on ITM long term; are you currently in. I always thought it looked a steal at 37p, given s cash in bank and previous highs.

There’s a loss of focus here.

Originally the system was to deal with non recyclable plastics, then came hydrogen off takes, then that was dropped and the focus was back to basics and now Syngas, hydrogen and SAF are what everyone is focussing on.

There’s very little mention of the problem solving side of this tech now, which was why I originally invested 15 years ago, before selling!!

Is it because they’ve been told no one is interested in using this for the primary purpose of dealing with non recyclable waste?

Why isn’t there a local council trialling this?

Had the company not squandered all their dilution money over the years, they could have placed a couple of prototypes out in to industry and would have everything needed to demo and sell these system!!

Cracking news for AFC!!

Divvy - what make you so sure it will happen, just out of interest?

Seems a long time since this almost hit 6p, 4 years ago. Currently that's 1,100% away.

Probably probably 3,000% after a fund raise or 30 bags as some would say!!

You must have a very low average :)

In fact, according to Swazers in his many, many, many, long posts; PHE has never been in a better position to take the market by storm.

I'm sure it's therefore just a matter of time before an RNS is released stating someone has signed on the dotted line!

According to those in the know on here and no doubt the TG, there's a huge amount going on with numerous interested parties and lots of trials; so nothing to worry about :)

'After all they're engineers' - you do make me laugh Castle

You'd have made considerably more money if you'd stick your cash in an FTSE 100 ISA than here

That wouldn't have dropped 50% after a CMD - crackers.

Are you buying more now, or waiting for the next share issue?

🤪🤣

You've certainly done that here each!! Maybe grow some, accept your losses and move on FFS!! ;))

Excellent rise for HUI, surprised Each hasn't been posting on there today, he normally likes to say what a load of rubbish it is.

Maybe their near to getting a contract?

Anomaly, you’ve used ChatGPT none stop to try and discredit any poster with a view on PHE that you don’t care for.

You don’t engage in debate around the company, it’s simply you reposting ChatGPT’s ‘cutting rebuttal’ with added sarcasm. It even asks you if you want a more cutting response, so presumably to select that option as well.

Feel free to come back when you have something worthwhile to say

"Apologies Dusty, i'm happy to stop, just not happy for the cretins to continue with a pass. Just to close I do wonder what he meant by 'I’m a qualified non-practising Solicitor (career change)"

No, you're not happy to stop, you like to carry on with the armchair Ai responses and your lack of real world experience and how things work! Are you a retired teacher by any chance! Either way, we can now all clearly see what TP3 means about you being a fake and fraud!

You rely on ChatGPT to create all your replies, seemingly incapable of replying yourself, with zero argument to back anything up; both on a personal and PHE level.

Not too long after your unwanted return, you joyfully told everyone here, how you could keep as long as needed and that you actually enjoyed it!! So we've just had another of your great hypocritical comments!!

If you want to keep it focused on PHE, fine, but you'll need to stop using ChatGPT for your responses, as it defaults to focusing on the poster rather than debating the content.

Ah, the internet’s favourite pastime — armchair forensics on other people’s CVs. You talk like you’re cross-examining someone, but your evidence wouldn’t survive a pub argument.

You’ve managed to write three paragraphs of character assassination without addressing a single point of substance.

For clarity (though you don’t seem to value it): working within law and working as a lawyer aren’t the same thing. If your best move in a debate is to concoct a personality profile instead of engaging with the argument, you’ve already lost.

What’s genuinely funny is how obsessed you are with other people’s bios, even though you can't accurately repeat what was said. You write like you’re unmasking fraud, when really, you’re just bitter that someone knows what they’re talking about and doesn’t need to Google their own opinions.

Fell free, Inspector Clouseau, to let me know if any this writing style rings a bell with you?

Now, unless you’ve got something more substantial than playground gossip dressed up as analysis, I’ll leave you to your amateur sleuthing.

No Anomaly, I don't work in law, I just happen to have a degree in law, the LPC and a degree in Business. Means FA compared to years of experience.

I have to admit, I'm quite impressed with the Ai replies you've been using. I prefer to send my ow, but happy to lower myself to your level when in Rome!!

Here we go, the old “I’m calm and composed, therefore I must be right” routine — always the last refuge when the argument starts slipping through your fingers.

You can sneer about ghostwriters and attention spans all you want, but it doesn’t disguise the fact that your “facts and reasoning” amount to a lot of adjectives and not much substance.

So while you’re congratulating yourself for sounding like the adult in the room, maybe take a breath and notice that you’re the only one in your room. Some of us prefer clarity over theatre — even when the punctuation’s having a better time than you are.

Ah, there it is — the classic LinkedIn-warrior move: mistake condescension for insight, then pad it out with buzzwords and a dash of wishful authority.

You talk about “controlling behaviour” and “defining the field” like you’ve just discovered the glossary at the back of a patent attorney’s handbook.

Deterrence only works when there’s credible force behind it — otherwise it’s theatre. The idea that filings alone create leverage is the sort of corporate bedtime story people tell themselves to sleep through due diligence.

As for the “send me your business card” line — adorable. If you ever make it to a table where deals are actually negotiated, you’ll find that paper trophies don’t impress anyone who can read a balance sheet. The grown-ups don’t care how many jurisdictions you filed in if you can’t defend a single one.

But by all means, keep mistaking tone for intelligence. It’s entertaining, in the way a child lecturing a chess master on how the horsey moves is entertaining.

Hahahaha - Anomaly you bloody fraud!!

Write you own posts or as Swazers likes to say STFU!!