Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Reardon, I feel for you, I am in the same boat but this is an anomaly and you have made good profit, selling is always the hardest part.
Well done all, may still have a way to go.
HH, I didn't say this morning, nor did I say I sold at the top, I stopped worrying about tops and bottoms many moons ago, my concern is only the % P&L.
This one did over 200% so more than happy to leave some cream for others, it helps to make a market.
GL
585297 @ 16:19 but who's counting.
If you are holding, genuinely I wish you the best of British, everyone has their own strategy.
After a 1k punt on Friday @ .17 I have now closed the position as I suspect many are now doing.
GL to anyone leaving their chips on the table, I may well be back after Weds morning if things go well at the hearing.
This could go mental from here.
That is my prediction, based on the volume/acceleration of current projects, it's a way off AP's average of 18p although he was optimistic enough to invest a significant amount in the last placing @0.55p so he must be confident.
The imminent release of the diamond parcel will only accelerate the plan.
It's been a drag (I know iv'e been invested here a while) however Vast has gone through the painstakingly slow process of getting mining projects off the ground and into production and now in profit (look out for the RNS) with all the false dawns and fundraisings etc that are inevitable in this sector.
I can see a rerate coming now and I wish all invested the best of luck over the coming months.
RD
With some details and wording still being worked out, “I am going to confirm the plan,” Isgur said.
I wonder what the detail is that he is referring to? Also how the UK administration application will be received with the "going concern" part of the statement now that new money is available.
All in the hands of the Judge, the numbers looked good on the latest proposal to me, the only tweek/recommendation I think he may make would be to rule a tiny payout to SH from the new money in as forms part of the deal, although this would represent a massive return from the current sp it would only need to be less than 1% of the new money and would negate the need for an equity provision to current SH. I personally think this would get it over the line.
GLA