Member Info for ratcliffewriter

So if they sign and it goes up 500 percent from here, that'll take it to a level about 66 percent down on where the sp was when the loi was signed.

Whereas the conspiracy theorists and bad mouthers who speculated maliciously on the reasons for his departure will.

Life is very unfair. R.I.P. John Chiplin.

'The truth is you are absolutely DISGUSTING.'

Not true.

You want to see me when I'm drunk.

'The truth is you are absolutely DISGUSTING.'

Not true.

You want to see me when I'm drunk.

For 'indenture' read 'I don't'. 🤪

my impression was that they are open to realistic/substantial offers, but the message was that if no adequate offer is forthcoming then they appear to have access to the means to continue as far as necessary, i.e. the longer anybbidder waits, the more it will cost them, and they can't hold a 'sell or go bust' gun to the company's head. whether that's a poker move or not indenture know but it was delivered with relaxed confidence so i suspect not. also it was very obvious that ld was putting out exactly what she wanted to have heard (an already refused bidder with a tight wallet maybe?) as the questions had not been rehe****d by the interviewer, and certainly not written by her. imo the video was one loud and clear message from the company. (other opinions featuring bankruptcy, charlatanism and being taken private are also available, but like a leaky egg cup, the hold less water than most)

I always though scinv was a bit of a merchant banker.

'I don't believe you because it shows.'

Snap.

So what are your qualifications scinv? I have a PhD in molecular biology and have worked in pharma m and a plus have run my own company for 15 years before a VERY profitable buyout. You don't believe me? Very wise. Same as your experience and knowledge. University of Jackanory.

Are you under stress scinv? You just seem very touchy. Given that admin have been good enough to post a relevant link, maybe they are the ones who have seen and removed whatever posts of yours that have gone. After all, posts only get removed if they breach posting rules, not 'on request'. That's another long-perpetuated myth among trolls. But you aren't a troll if course, because you've said you aren't so it must be true.

Mind you don't pivot too quickly and get dizzy scinv. Keep us posted on your fraud investigation in the meanwhile please.

You know what I'm saying scinv, and I know you know.

'....surely that person should answer whether they are a biomedical professional or a finance professional. Don't you think?'

Troll rule 1 - find out as much as possible about someone you want to discredit.

I think Bermuda has been around long enough not to fall for that old one. Try making a statement then saying 'so we're all agreed...'

That's a traditional one too.

He's tenacious for sure, but that isn't always a virtue.

The Farce is strong with this one...

'We are in vaccine land' - vindicates LD and RG believing in their course and science all through the years when vaccines were entirely out of favour. Exciting times...

I'd say the 150k on Aquis was a buy at 9.95, the bid was well below that by then. Alternatively it's a sell at a premium. Of course being a bear of very little brain I'm sure there are intelligent posters who will tell me I am wrong and it signifies the imminent demise of the company and the end of civilisation as we know it. Hey ho...

To be fair to SD she did say "Although the sub-license of VAL201 to TheoremRx has taken longer to complete than initially anticipated, during the course of the past four months, ValiRx has been continuing to conduct due diligence on TheoremRx and its scientific plans and remains confident that it is well placed to conduct the ongoing development of the VAL201 programme. Our due diligence procedures are now complete and during this final extension of exclusivity we will continue to provide scientific support to TheoremRx's trial start-up processes to ensure no further delays are encountered."

Problem is, that was in March 2022. Good job they haven't encountered any further delays then...

Feeling the strain PM? You and Clarence seem to have run out of even unreasoned debate and are now becoming insidiously abusive. It's an approach that makes it look like you really do believe P9 is correct in forecasting another placing before long.

'Intentionally misleads investors'? I think you need to be taking allegations of that nature to a regulatory authority. But you won't, because in reality you're just doing a bit of a twisting job and intentionally misleading posters... Or at least attempting to.