RE: Full Exit Analysis20 Apr 2026 10:10
@Footandmouth just to clarify 'Just because £1b gives £1 pound for share in what way is that rational valuation ?' My refs (assuming your comment is on the back of my own) to £1 were not trying to be a rationale valuation based on detailed analysis. It was however highlighting PG's previous reference to £1 whether correctly interpreted or not it was a number he picked out, why? (It may have been totally irrelevant or it was more significant)
With the filly diluted equity position it just so happens £1 broadly aligns to £1bn. Obviously that is not how we would expect them to value any deal I do think £1bn or more is significant for optics and puts any deal into the 'Big category' for almost anyone and PG wants a BIG deal. As I pointed out in the same post as we have not seen the latest ITR so it is hard to know what the latest view is and why I did not provide a detailed view on the valuation outcome. I think PG is willing to deal and deal big otherwise why bother boxing your self in with divestment comms 6 months ago, again more recently commit to by Q3/4 and hire an agent all this time.
A Big Gucerif deal now which completes in a few months and then a T&T exit in Q3/4 sticks to his stated timetable. In parallel a Gucerif deal now means in parallel he can commit on new asset deals which then complete post Gucerif deal and before T&T exit. That is how I see it with the details and moving parts allowing multiple permutations of these events.
What is your view on PGs minimum exit price and why? what do you think he deals on near term?