Member Info for ralph2010

Not so. We have been through this a few days ago.

Got a hunch the default position would be to stay it.

No Wrath
of the 355, 156 have had annulment attempted.

6 out of 156 = 3.8%
13 out of 156 = 8.3%

combined 19 out of 156 = 12.17%

registration form is in english.........

donalb hoe

Just being cautious Ovets. Yes I have shown frustration with this, so what, most people have, apart from you seemingly. You are better than everyone else though of course.

Well, I knew a guy once who had sorted a deal to sell his company for £300 million and become super rich, the day before he was due to sign on the dotted line 2008 happened, the deal was off and he ended up having to issue preference shares to even keep his company going in the midst of the meltdown. From super rich to barely holding on and his own ordinary stocks worthless.

I will remain cautious about funding until its present and in my face, everyone else can think what they want.

Funding - Wonder if there could be some state backing ?

I wouldn't think so Ovets. A few staffers wages are not meaningful towards the $billion or so that is needed for SL. We have had all the jobs vacancies, teams put together and FEEDS for years here, all have amounted to nothing. Your question isn't a serious one as usual, the snarky undertone and attacking nature of it just makes me yawn at you.

What is a concern right now is the collapsing bank sector, is RKH going to be shafted by circumstances they cant control yet again ? Can Navitas get the funds now ?

Don't you own Argos by now Garbs ?

You are moaning that you dont get it. There has been NO RNS for price affecting news such as lower Taxes and a 2026 1st Oil date.

Fill your boots then Spacehopper. I will hold fire, PMO said similar things and of course FIG are drooling at all the cash that could be coming their way. Disappointing that no revised Tax plan has been reached seemingly .

Garbs you will get credit if what you said comes to pass and perhaps people will listen to you more from then on.

But thats the problem Garbled ! They haven't confirmed what you said. You cant blame some us for being skeptical, you could be telling 100% truth, but that remains to be seen

"totally validate Market-Dealer's original post of the 4th March" NO ! it doesn't, he gave a specific year of 2026 for 1st oil which has not been confirmed in the release. This is a very important piece of information ! Nothing has changed since the money is still not there, there has been no RNS. It was nothing more than the usual regurgitated platitudes and "intent" statements.

"Navitas have put their money where their mouth is" - have to disagree, they have not put any meaningful funds into this yet as they do not have it. The meetings have already been reported and I think previous RNS's will already cover what has been going on?

ojogger - There wasn't really anything price moving in it, just the usual "intent" etc etc. A LOI wont even move this much, money on the table will. Back to under 10p soon enough.

Perhaps Garbs has had us fooled all along with his 300 IQ and we just think he is nuts. Just like Columbo, he has acted dumb, but is a genius ! He could have won an Oscar for this !

GarbsRab why don't you just answer his queries ?

Or they want out because this is crap ?

Garbs works for RAB !

A meeting so good in the FI that a major holder has dumped their stock. Hmmmm

Why do you consider stating a fact is rude ? Your call has failed yet again.