RE: Call me silly but..18 Sep 2025 21:53
Alert, what balanced discussions are you referring to? Many times I and others have asked for counter arguments against our more negative opinions. I've posted many times with quotes from RNS, detailing what the uber positives won't admit to be fact and receive nothing but insults, no counter arguments, no fact based narrative based on the RNS releases or the interviews. I'm more than happy to be convinced there's an investment case for PREM but I cannot see one when looking at all the information that's out there.
It's clear and obvious that more testing of the plant will not resolve the outstanding front end issues such as the sorters, mag sep etc. The so far completed test runs have confirmed the plant is capable of producing a saleable grade but of a lower quality than the test runs conducted over a year ago. The uber positives see this as progress, I and others do not. Millions have been raised and spent, shareholders diluted massively over the last few years, more so over the last couple of years, yet bills haven't been paid, staff weren't paid for nearly a year, force majeure declared against contractors so that retention payments need not be paid, yet all those millions raised for equipment and improvements were spent and no progress made whatsoever. So far GH has just regurgitated the same old GR rhetoric, more testing, more money needed etc etc. Yet the positives won't accept that further dilution is inevitable.