RE: SFO1 Dec 2020 18:23
Yes I would agree stay away from Petrochemicals. PFC can still provide services to the renewable sector like offshore wind which is projected to quadruple under government green plans.
But renewables and Lithium Battery related Commodities? There will be rising demand for Nickel (main concern from Elon Musk), Lithium, Copper - anything that goes into Battery manufacturing.
Also renewables and fuel cells, heat pumps (Gar Boilers not allowed in new homes from mid 2020s) .
Anyway the world is transitioning away from Petrochemicals towards Electricity for transport, Battery Storage, Renewable Energy, Small Modular Nuclear reactors and lowering carbon footprint.
I have a Tesla and charge on 2kw per hr cheap overnight Electricity. Great car and at 4.7p per KW gives for 3-4 mile of range so very cheap to run. No oil changes, or maintenance just new Tyres every 40-60 thousand miles. No congestion charges (although I don't drive into central London they have been pushing for this to be extended out to the North Circular). And for long distance Travel the Supercharger network copes very well to get you there and back (Spain and back this summer).
LG have I think just split of their Battery Plants into a separate company in which I read Tesla want to take a 10% stake. Tesla itself up over 600% in just over a year.
I'm staying put with PFC for now until I get closer to break even. But I think before SFO case the y were at £8-£9 per share. Last year I think around £6 per share. So could rebound strongly on SFO closing down its investigation and vaccines for covid.