Member Info for Quady

Again we have snidey remarks from DBW.

A total coward in every way.

Of course I haven't MathersFinger.

Are you trying to say that because I don't care what the price is until we have an outcome, that I don't want the share price to do well.

Of course not.

I really don't understand your thinking.

Rodney, Stas worked it out wrong.

He used the resource estimate in the calculation.

You cannot do that, it forms no part of the NAV calculation.

It does however form part of the NPV calculation.

They are two different measurements.

MathersFinger I just had a look at the post you mentioned.

Don't understand your point.

The share price is what it is.

It doesn't matter, nice to see it going up, but it doesn't matter, as I am not selling.

Rodney I am happy where the company is for many reasons.

I was happy when the share price was 1.5 pence a share.

That was shortly after I bought in at an average of 4.6 pence a share.

That's because I evaluate Solgold to be a long term prospect.

I don't care what the share price is on a day to day basis, as I understand that value will out.

However Stas got the calculation wrong, I believe he confused NPV with NAV.

Please check, find an official website that gives Solgold's NAV.

I don't believe you will find one.

Richer I respond to abuse.

Slug and DBW being the main instigators.

But Redknight and Jezzoo nearly as bad.

Anyone who doesn't throw abuse at me, gets a curtious reply.

Rodney as far as I can figure out, they got close to the NPV figure.

Solgold doesn't have a NAV yet.

That's why you cannot find it.

I see DBW the board snide has appeared.

Falls on deaf ears with you Jezzoo.

Even if you read how to calculate NAV you wouldn't understand it.

Rodney you seem a decent enough type, but if you think we are being shorted to such an extent that it makes a difference, sorry but you are wrong.

Also the £1.64 per share NAV calculation is wrong.

You cannot include the resource figure in the NAV.

You include it in the NPV.

Two totally different calculations.

Even when we are producing you can only include part of the resource in the NAV, depending on the criteria at the time.

The share price at the moment is down to volume.

If you don't believe me on the NAV, then look up the NAV for Solgold and post the link please.

I cannot help you if you don't understand the way that share prices operate, as although you can read up on it.

Nothing replaces decades of experience.

Affrm how do you know there are more buys than sells.

As what is reported is whatever is closest to the last transaction.

Also how do you know when delayed trades take place.

This is why sustained volume is important, as continuous volume means things play out much faster and we get a more representative picture.

Having more buys in a day doesn't mean the share price goes up.

It doesn't work like that.

This share is absolutely not being held back, back to poor volume.

Just over 5 million.

We were achieving over 15 million a day.

Unless volume increases we will drop back.

How much no one can say.

But we are back to needing more volume.

I just bought just over 28000 shares.

Just a small punt.

Nice to see we have some support at 14 pence.

Let's hope it is above 14 pence at the end of the day.

I know addicknt, I was addressing BBG's nonsense.

Addicknt that may be so, but it's certainly not to enable a friendly takeover.

BBG that is a desperate attempt at pretending we are going to be bid for.

We could just appoint someone if that was the case.

Are you telling me that the Solgold board cannot count.

They are incapable of understanding an offer should they get one.

If course not.

Now let's look at the real reason they are onboard.

We know that we are going to start construction any day now.

We know we are moving towards the DFS.

So maybe they have arrived to stage loans or some other types of finance in the event that we mine Tandy first

That makes sense, as the company is required to be transparent and report accurately anything that would materially affect the share price.

Slug the data sets are the mathematics.

You said you don't believe the datasets.

Therefore you don't believe in mathematics.

You then say CO2 can be measured after saying it can't.

You're a liar at every stage.

The ice cores don't go back millions of years.

They are accurate in the hundreds of thousands of years.

The silt measurements are where we go back millions of years.

Yes it's measured.

When you talk about 8 times the level of today, that's before we had an atmosphere like today and human life was impossible.

You somehow seem to think that human life not being possible is a good thing, I don't think you even understand that at today's levels Human life wouldn't have got going.

And before you say something imbecilic like we have human life today, try understanding the difference.

We had to have levels of between 150-200 parts per million for mammals to start.

Our evolution of the planet would have been vastly different if CO2 had never dropped to these levels in the first place.

The sea life is in danger today as our oceans are becoming more acidic.

Life would have found it much harder to take hold in the early stages.

The Cumbrian explosion would have never happened.

We know all this as it has been shown.

Luckily imbeciles like you are going to be a thing of the past, ad societies across the world become better educated.

So slug you don't believe in mathematics and you don't believe that scientists can measure the CO2 in the atmosphere.

As you don't believe in data sets.

Even I didn't believe you were that big an Imbecile.

I guess I was wrong.

Tell you what slug.

Let's take this in baby steps.

Do you agree with the data sets, that are taken all around the world, on CO2 emissions and the measurements.

If not show me which ones you disagree with.