Member Info for pwlx

I would not support that personally. The options make no difference to when a sale may or may not happen; they were legitimately earned at the time they were awarded; and it’s much more productive if you have concerns to attend the AGM and have a discussion than to start trying to add ineffective punishment resolutions to the AGM.

Going to see a bunch of delayed prints today. Somebody’s bought about 50k shares off book this morning that we’ll see later. Also sells of about 15k not reported yet. Pre-cursor to a little uptick hopefully.

Bill - Toffers is clearly kira / Matrix Analysis / Frances, no doubt about it. Only a matter of time before she's thrown in the bin AGAIN... Report report report - total spam.

So Toffers today is accusing the company of lying about their cash position, in an RNS released only yesterday. Yet again can everyone report this libelous post please - need to get Frances back in the bin again where she belongs.

Del. We’ve got the entitlement to the Nyud project as RNS’d. MT DFS is in progress, as RNS’d.

Take a break from being here every single day, carry on with your life, let the company carry on with their work and by all means - if we haven’t heard that the DFS has been signed off by the time the AGM comes around then join me in attending and questioning them about it but jeez, give it a break on the daily…

Clearly I picked the wrong day to check in on LSE…

B o r e.

O f f.

F r a n c e s.

Bore off Frances.

You're right sbrace - 100% Matrix Analysis back again. Just had a further look through her previous posts, the screaming banshee can't change her spots...

Ikn, I’m having a lovely time reporting his past posts for disruption. They’ll be in the bin soon along with all their other past monikers…

Just for clarification here and to combat Toffers’ absurd comments regarding these court cases - that they could somehow cost the company millions and put us under, that’s absolute, 100% nonsense.

The Queeld court case is about the issue of replacement share certificates, not money. Even if, and it’s a massive if given the flimsy nature of their case (I’ve read the court documents) Queeld were to win, Eurasia would simply issue replacement certificates and move on.

The Logik case is about £300,000. Not millions, and even if (again a big if) Logik were to win, Eurasia can very easily cover this amount and move on.

Toffers, do one.

Can't see it personally. The company have told us they're looking primarily at green bonds for the majority of funding which is certainly the best option. They'll clearly be looking at Plan B/C/D as well but no reason to believe we're headed towards a JV when other very viable and preferable options exist.

Absolutely - top summary AsiaMarket! The debt finance was actually the most positive part for me of this morning's RNS. I feel like I've been fighting placing rumours for months now saying that the company would never raise through the markets at these levels, and finally it looks like the company have confirmed this. Very pleasing to see.

Somebody’s obviously had a word with Southern Gold. Cancelling their share sale… interesting!

JV I’d understand but would not be a fan of a buyout personally… Long term returns are far better for everyone if Alkemy retain ownership themselves.

Not sure why it’s unbelievable - we all know the war screwed everything up, we just have to deal with the extended timeline while they change course and continue working towards a sale. Getting there…

Marty - doesn't matter if it's a bank holiday in NZ or not, you can't RNS on a bank holiday when you're listed on the LSE. Personally expecting results either today or tomorrow.

Definitely matrix. Have reported, needs to be banned again.

And also, the Justice and Home Affairs committee is a House of Lords committee rather than a govt. department with the power to intervene in judicial proceedings. They can discuss things and impact potential legislation, and conduct inquiries when things go wrong, but they wouldn’t be able to have an impact on a court case or pass judgement on one.

Apologies if I came across as being obstinate - just trying to inform rather than be a d1ck.

I’m not being an ********, just letting you know

Well, for your future reference the JHA isn't really a thing - the Justice Dept and the Home Office are two separate government entities, so that's never going to appear in a legal filing. And the Home Office certainly wouldn't have jurisdiction over this kind of court case anyway. You can find the Home Office responsibilities on the UK Govt. website - nothing to do with this.