RE: Jv10 May 2026 18:57
BB more not so subtle deramp "it’s still an ask for an industry partner to invest millions in the remaining risk in hope of success." I mean it is such a stupid statement it doesn't really need further comment. Although sure it will go off on one of it's 2 page unreadable monologues.
Well I am so surprised that they have appointed PVE when all they have to do is read the daily waffling monologues of the know it all HE1 expert. In fact I am shocked he hasn't need invited to sit on the BOD as a non exec. How can HE1 be so daft as to pass up the "knowledge, experience and brilliance" of this one company trader/troll?
Also surprised a MM hasn't snapped them up as expert on everything about shares and movements as well.
In fact Starmer get out we got someone here who no doubt knows everything about your job as well lol
Just a shame some of us seen through them from the beginning eh
Caught out lying recently about not being a trader, how they been in for years blah blah blah.......but as they do they managed to get posts removed. Probably will again as they hate being exposed. Just like below eh? Just a few samples, there are many many more in your history........
"Yes, I sold mine as soon as the deal was announced in RNS, too risky for me. I’m aware others bought the news, which is their choice. I’m sure there’s an opportunity when this has cleared."
"too much uncertainty for me until the bulk of the CLNs are converted or there is a concrete roadmap to near term revenue."
" I felt it was too unpredictable and risky to hold any shares through it, and why I'm more interested in 'when' the overhang will be cleared than 'what' the price might be."
"I'm not interested in buying shares at any price until the CLN overhang has been cleared or until there's significant news to outweigh that price risk."
"I don't have a buy in price. I wouldn't buy in at any price in the current circumstance"
Honest as the day is long Guv..........