Member Info for Punter1234

Saloon I don't have to watch it again mate. What he means is 1/2 weeks after the results will be released to the market via RNS at end of EWT and official Lab results back to the company.

@saloon65 you are wrong on this, sorry. Come on you must have seen other companies RNS of EWT results etc.

The move to resources via JORC will take a few weeks but after successful EWT it is a gimme. In fact likely be another SP booster when the reserves are upgraded as I hope and expect. dyor GL

@Saloon65 yes it will, for a CPR for JORC.

But that will be after the RNS otherwise you would be waiting a long time for it!

Certainly takes one to know one eh? lack of attention must be killing you lol

Huh? You do realise the Webinar is just so investors can follow the AGM online if can't/don't want to attend?

The Company have asked for questions to be submitted before the AGM, so they can collate, many of which will be the same or similar, and have their answers ready.

You can of course simply ask any question on the day as is every shareholder's right.

If they don't release a RNS before the AGM they won't be answering anything much but likely side stepping. The reason being is you have to release any company/SP relevant info to the whole market at the same time not just the shareholders.

I would be shocked if no RNS before the AGM. That would not be good..............

Sproule? They won't have anything to do with the RNS. The flow rates will be published and the Helium concentration will come back from the Labs to be included.

having proved the commerciality (we all hope) they will then move to get the "resources" into "booked reserves" via JORC.

"Resources" are geological estimates whereas "Reserves" are economically and technically profitable

Sproule did a resource evaluation based on historical data.

"Sproule ERCE Confirms Sagebrush as a Flagship Helium Project with Significant Commercial Upside"

The last bit means because the lower layer was not taken into account when doing their report as there was no data for it. Only for the upper layer. The 3D seismic showed that the lower layer had the greatest potential. Join the Dots folks :-)

"32 years in uniform I’d be pretty hard to surprise in that respect"

"I’m a pensioner so don’t have the same risk tolerance as others may have.

thanks for letting us know mate

Hooray for that lol!

@triking next time you on here see if you extract your tongue from your hero's backside where it seems firmly stuck....not a good look,,,,,try to think for yourself....you sayin...........

What a childish post by someone who goes around bb's acting like a sage dispensing pompous advice to one and all........

Just a heads up for anyone Re Zoffy. Just look at it's posts on HE1.....an out and out troll and here for a reason out of the blue. Massive tool

And while on what we done to deserve the HE1 troll zoffy here ffs! His masters moved him over. watch and be incredibly bored.

The amount of trolls turning up just another indication the news os coming shortly

Only if you got no bolls or brains mate

@paulie and how do you know that eh? there is nothing factually to say they have. Got any TR1 proof etc. No. of course not, just another deramp

@nozzleblast you been posting tripe! You trying to ramp now after switching but so confused now you don't know what you are saying lol I guess your "trading" view has changed since you posted the below eh?

"The chances are that the commercial flow test won't be conclusive, and they will have to drill again in a different location, as indicated by the seismic data. This will take time, and money. The stock will, in the meantime, fluctuate wildly (read - drop precipitously), as the value of the asset cannot be stated with any certainty."

That's called being busted pal now shhhh perhaps?

OK, I can't deal with these idiots anymore..........got better things to do.

Wow, what words of eh.....nothingness lol

But then again some have been fools all their lives and like nothing better than a good whine and contribute little else

Nozzleblast tell me why the porosity is questionable? give me figures and what facts you basing it on. Or shut up what you don't know about

Why you get your order in early and might have to take what is on offer and when offered or end up with nothing. This is not popping around to Tesco's and picking on off the shelf

Hiring or leasing a helium tube trailer in Montana typically involves a waiting time of 4 to 8 weeks for standard units, and 3 to 6 months for custom cryogenic or ultra-high-pressure specifications.

Because helium logistics are highly specialized, rental lead times vary based on equipment type, certification (DOT/ASME), and lease duration.

National suppliers such as Linde and Air Products dominate the market. They often require long-term offtake or supply agreements tied to the rental of their transport assets.

Factors Impacting Waiting Time/Supply Chain Constraints: Due to increased production at Montana-based helium exploration projects, specialized trailers are highly allocated.

Maintenance Turnarounds: A major driver of the 4–8 week wait for standard rentals is the required hydrostatic retesting and re-certification of pressure vessels between users.

Availability: Spot-rentals (short-term hiring) often face longer wait times than entering a dedicated master lease agreement with a major gas distributor.

ps odds long term contracts going back and forth between Lawyers before final signing - 1/2

Nozzleblast back for more negativity eh with AI and wrong suppositions and little research.

The bottom line is they weren't interested in Helium in the 90's as they price didn't justify the cost so they did the bare minimum. So your "near certain failure" is not really true as they didn't bother doing a full flow test.

Your views on porosity are also wrong. Do a bit of research on porosity in other Wells in the Leadville.

"The Sagebrush-1 well was drilled in 1993 to a depth of 7,467 feet, targeting the Leadville and Ismay formations. While the Ismay zone went on to produce more than 300,000 barrels of oil, a drill stem test in the Leadville flowed gas containing 2.76% helium, ~19.5% methane and heavier hydrocarbons. Wireline logs confirmed up to 94 feet of net gas pay.

The DST shut-in pressure continued to build at the end of the test, suggesting higher flow rates could be achieved with modern completion techniques. The well was cased and remains available for re-entry and further testing, providing Mosman with a significant time and cost advantage in advancing the project."

The historical data from 1993 has been independently reviewed by Sproule ERCE and is considered reliable for resource assessment purposes.

So your AI analysis pretty redundant imho..........Plus they testing the lower layer which they think has the greatest potential then the upper layer where those historical results are from.

You get rid of a couple of annoying trolls and up pops...think we all taken our positions now and no amount of smoke and mirrors gooblygook with a bit of ill informed AI going to change my convictions thanks

But Element1 you were previously banned as Hydro/hydrowrong hence why you reappeared in dec 2024. ironically that was after spamming ggp where you were detested. you have reinvented yourself but looks like you heading the same way again.

You know what to do folks to be rid of

PI just for you

Plant not working - 150/1

Plant stopped for short periods for routine maintenance /safety upgrades - Evs

Plant had some ramp up hiccups (normal) - 2/1

Buy out (at this stage) - 1000/1