Member Info for PubCrawl

@Deep100

Good luck continuing to misinterpret “suspended for future operations … to deepen the well” (as quoted literally in the RNS you keep reposting) as “no re‑entry”, but hey, if you’re bored of science and just love drama, feel free to hang around. You’re doing a stellar job embodying “deep digging deeper into negativity,” not data. 💼📄

Best wishes with stalking my posts, it’ll keep you busy 😅

Deep100, you’re starting to sound like a child who didn’t get their helium balloon.

If you don’t like my posts, or being called out for months of hit-and-run negativity, might I politely suggest the filter option? It’s right there.

Otherwise, keep digging… though ironically, the deeper you go, the less substance you seem to find.

Deep, you’re boring the board with recycled doubts, the science moved on, pity your understanding didn’t.

Deep100, selective with no context is your middle name…

· “Tai‑3 well has now been suspended for future operations that will involve drilling deeper into the Basement target, where an increase in helium shows were encountered whilst drilling”

So yes, the RNS confirms they did plan to go back, they suspended Tai‑3 specifically to return later and drill deeper into the basement, where helium shows increased. It’s direct, clear, and black & white.

No misinterpretation required, just read the sentence next time.

Deep, for someone so confident about the depths, you’re oddly nervous about what might rise to the surface. Calling Tai-3 a disaster says more about your analysis skills than the well.

Deep100, appreciate the concern, but I’m thinking one step ahead, not behind.

Yes, the current RNS confirms the ESP is at Itumbula, that’s the immediate test. But given Tai-3’s proven high helium concentrations and prior wireline data, it’s entirely reasonable (and arguably strategic) to assume Tai isn’t off the table if the concept proves successful.

This isn’t amateur hour, it’s called anticipating the next move. Might look early today… but check back when the chessboard shifts.

Better to be ahead of the RNS than always reading it in past tense. ♟️📈

And let’s be honest, for someone who claims to know it all, you sure spend a lot of time popping in with doubt every few weeks. You’re not here to inform, you’re here to hedge your own nerves. Less seasoned investor, more part-time pessimist with a WiFi connection.

Wannabe trader energy… just without the trades.

Anything else “not factual “ in this thread? Come on, we’re waiting…….

Admit, you learnt something ……

Thank me later 👋

@Boeingdriver,

I get it, the share price is low, frustration’s high, and you’re looking for somewhere to land that anger. But don’t aim the nose at me just because you’re flying through turbulence. Let’s break down your post with a bit of cabin lighting, shall we?

“I would have more respect for you if you just accept the fact that this is a complete disaster no matter how you look at it.”

Funny, from where I’m sitting, HE1 has already delivered helium well above commercial thresholds, and we’re weeks away from the world’s first proper helium-from-water flow test. That’s not a disaster. That’s a dataset waiting to complete itself.

“Do yourself a favour and take some time away from this board.”

Some people leave before takeoff. I’ll stay strapped in thanks, the test is the main event, and I don’t mind keeping receipts.

“You have lost all credibility and frankly just coming across as silly.”

Credibility isn’t lost by being early and informed, it’s lost by pretending the game’s over before the whistle. If you’ve really been invested for years, you should know better than to fold one move before the reveal.

“I’m heavily invested and have been for years…..maybe one day a miracle will happen…….that’s exactly what it’s going to take to get out of this mess.”

You’re invested, but calling for miracles instead of recognising the science-based method playing out? That’s not an investment thesis, that’s fatigue. And I get it. But calling it a mess while the test is literally mobilising? You’re bailing on the plane while it’s still taxiing.

Let’s be clear: if the ESP test delivers stable helium flow at decent concentrations, HE1 doesn’t just recover, it rerates hard. And when that happens, I’ll be happy to accept your apology, possibly in business class.

Until then, feel free to keep the seatbelt fastened. You chose the handle Boeingdriver, but right now it’s sounding more like co-pilot of doom. ✈️📉📈

Helium One has already done the hard work that many doubted, confirming high helium concentrations at the Tai-3 well. Wireline sampling returned helium percentages well above commercial thresholds, putting the Rukwa project firmly on the global helium map. This validated resource sets a strong foundation.

Now, with the Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) deploying, the upcoming test will reveal the next critical piece: can helium-rich formation water be produced continuously and sustainably? This is not just any well test, it’s the first commercial-scale attempt anywhere to extract helium directly from formation water, a process well-supported by scientific research but never before proven in practice.

The outcomes to watch for are clear: helium must be recovered at surface, concentrations should be commercially meaningful, and flow rates stable enough to support production.

• In a modest scenario, measurable helium in the flow-back, even at lower concentrations or rates, would represent a technical success. This would justify a resource reassessment and could lift the share price into the 1–2p range as speculative interest returns.

• A stronger outcome, with helium concentrations above 0.3% and stable flow rates, would transform HE1 from explorer to early-stage producer. This would likely attract offtake interest, partnerships, and new funding avenues, potentially driving the share price to 3p or higher depending on market sentiment.

• The most bullish, yet credible, scenario is sustained flow with helium concentrations approaching or exceeding 1%. Given the nitrogen-dominant, hydrocarbon-free reservoir, this would be a rare, commercially attractive breakthrough. In this case, HE1 could become a global first mover in a novel extraction method, with share price multiples of 5–10x not out of the question.

This isn’t a speculative gamble. It’s a meticulously planned, science-backed test, built on years of data, structural mapping, and peer-reviewed research. Success here could not only transform HE1 but reshape global helium supply dynamics, critical at a time of tightening helium demand and supply.

Investors should watch closely. The helium is real. The reservoir is charged. Now it’s time to see if it flows. The next RNS could move more than just molecules, it could redefine an entire market. 💨📈

Helium One didn’t stumble into Tanzania on a hunch, it was Durham and Oxford geoscientists who first identified the Rukwa Basin as a potential world-class helium system, based on fault structures, crustal helium generation, and groundwater migration.

Now, we’ve got peer-reviewed scientific backing for the very mechanism HE1 is about to test:

✅ Helium is produced via radioactive decay

✅ It dissolves in deep formation water

✅ That water migrates along faults

✅ Helium degasses into shallow traps during pressure drops

This process is detailed in a new 2025 scientific review, and it’s the exact model HE1 is testing at Tai-3 using an ESP to pump helium-rich fluids to surface.

No, there’s no other company commercially extracting helium directly from water, which is precisely what makes HE1’s test so groundbreaking.

If Tai-3 flows, it’s not just a discovery, it’s a scientific vindication.

Peer-reviewed paper backing the model:

👉 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2025.05.008

As Durham’s own Prof. Gluyas once said: “We followed the helium, and the science.”

HE1 might just be first to follow it all the way to production. 🌍💨🚀

Aww Deep100, issa widdle bit upset when no one claps for the gloom-gloom posts? 🍼 Maybe try a nap and a juice box before your next market prophecy. 🍼👶

Deep100, the irony is rich, complaining about being “attacked” while sneak-sniping like a budget Bond villain. 🎯 You’ve clearly forgotten how many times you’ve swung by to declare the end… only to vanish when the price rises. Maybe try consistency next time, it pairs better with credibility. 🔥🚀🚀🚀

Agree, Crypt. 🚀🚀🚀🚀

Deep100, popping up only when the SP’s down, like a bearish cuckoo clock. 🐤

And as for “forced” raises… maybe next time ask your Nomad nicely for a bedtime story too. 🔥🚀🚀🚀

There’s your rockets JSBoy22, going on 5

Deep100, with that much conspiracy, you might want to rename your private group chat “X-Files.” 👽 If the Nomad’s truly pulling all the strings, maybe swap the tinfoil hat for a buy button. 🎯

Warrie, if belief in potential is criminal, call me guilty and cuff me with conviction…..!meanwhile, you’re still circling the car park while others are eyeing the runway. ✈️😉

I say 20%, no reason not too.

Let’s jog back to 1p and sprint from there. 🏁💨

BluBay, I misread that bit, safely ignore. It was late, the coffee had worn off and the booze had taken over ☕🍷😅

That said, the upcoming ESP isn’t just about being good, it’s about being pioneering. Let’s see history written. Remaining extremely bullish here 🔥🚀

This one should work..

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2025.05.008

Now, here’s what’s key: HE1’s upcoming Q4 2025 ESP test at Tai-3 is effectively the same method, it’ll pump formation water with dissolved helium to surface and separate it. If the fluid behaves as hoped, Helium One is walking the same path DME proved works in the U.S. but HE1 does not have the complex gas system that DME also has.

They already did it in Arizona, HE1 just needs to go write the second chapter. 🔥🚀

@stamford

Absolutely, everyone’s entitled to their view, that’s what makes a market. But for balance, it’s worth noting helium in solution isn’t some unproven fantasy.

Take Desert Mountain Energy in Arizona, they’ve already achieved commercial success extracting helium from aquifer-based systems, not dissimilar to what HE1 is targeting. Their Weinrich No.1 well proves that with the right pressure, flow rates, and infrastructure (like ESPs), helium dissolved in formation water can be separated and monetised. It’s not a hypothetical, it’s already happening.

So while I respect concerns about recoverability, I remain extremely bullish. HE1’s upcoming ESP test isn’t just about proving flow, it’s about unlocking a method that’s already commercially validated elsewhere. If the test delivers even moderately well, the rerate could be swift and significant.

Eyes on the data, not just the doubt. 📊🚀