Member Info for ProfitSniffer

There are real cracks appearing in AI, it appears that too much trust has been placed in it, and it is too often far wrong.

In fact one of the most common current Google searches is "How do I turn off Co-Pilot"

The AI melt-up is strikingly similar to the Y2K nonsense except this time it's on steroids. I forget the exact percentage but I think it's around 50% of the S&P is made up of the mag 7 tech stocks. The potential for a monumental crash on overhyped stock valuations is all too clear.

LLMs are still very immature, almost as immature as the people who have programmed AI systems. I predict the whole technology will mature and find its relevant niches in the economy but companies will be wary of it and revert back to using people not AI to solve business problems.

What is undeniable is the race for processing power, and that needs reliable always-on energy. Not solar, not wind. Coal, gas, oil and nuclear

We will definitely see the final death of Net Zero in 2026 and the fascists will concentrate more on digital imprisonment.

You don't pass up on the opportunity to buy a tier 1 asset purely to "punish someone" you don't like. That's not how business works

They are not in a school playground.

Looks that way, but I doubt the odious Slack Arse is getting anything for 5p

Slack Arse has no shares, he's waiting for 5p.

More chance of me buying a milk float than that happening.

Gold rise is nothing to do with santa rallies or "tight liquidity"

It's because the Fed are printing again.

Morning fur burger

When in a bid situation, there are rules about what can be reported and how. There are only regulatory ways in which you can offer a hint to your shareholders without crossing a line.

Join the dots, if you can.

NMM - no I agree nothing changes between the letters and of course they are all implicitly non-binding on the grounds that the offer itself is non-binding as it stands (though some continue to misunderstand why rule 2.4 exists, but I leave that aside)

But they key terminology in the RNS of 12th December tells us explicitly that the BHP letter is non-binding whilst not mentioning this for all of the other letters of support. So why is this? It's not an administrative error, it is subtly telling us more.

Hi FTJNTY - always respected you and trust you're doing well.

It is obvious when Drake is in or out because he writes tedious, lengthy posts either pushing the case or sowing doubt as you say. Only a complete fool could not understand his game.

I'd rather poke my eyes out than read one of his posts to its conclusion. Fake Drake.

Because it was conditional, and that's why it explicitly said non-binding when the others all left the non-binding part as being implicit in regards to the offer not being binding.

For BHP to step aside, there has to be a condition and the clue was in that RNS.

Pad - not quite the option I had in mind. That would need some funding too so how much of the Cascabel cash would be get in that scenario?

And who wants to talk to Quady for another decade?

BHPs letter was explicitly rather than implicitly non-binding.

2 Then 3, and called it all along since the sneaky yellow twats chanced their arm.

There's also another scenario I see that could increase the price for shareholders. Let's just wait and see what happens this week.

Endless war and peace posts Drake

NOTHING YOU POST CAN DROP THE PRICE to let you back in

Yes please do take Forrest Gump away from here and focus his "attention" on an alternative platform. The forum will breathe a sigh of relief.

Usually they come as "secure messages" in your account/profile. There are then links to open a page to cast your votes.

Have you checked your message area on your accounts?

Jiangxi committed? Yes of course

Anyone compelled to vote in favour? of course not

I advised you to read the "possible takeover" rule 2.4 of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers and understand why it exists. You didn't. You continue to view the word "Possible" as meaning Jangxi can flash her baps and walk away like a tease at a school disco.

I have addressed the former part of your comment. I make no comment on the latter.

You have to make your own call. If you think 28p is all there is, then move on as it will take months on end and your funds can work for you elsewhere. I see a lot higher exit so I am holding and adding. Good luck whichever you decide

I'm an experienced investor, I know what I am talking about. And I know what I see right now. I also know it will shake out the weak

You don't have to hold, just sell and feck off. You will be happier in your own mind. But don't look in the rear view mirror.

Oh and take Peter Griffin/Bozi with you