Member Info for Private_Investor

Lallee: Stand by, the advisers, opinionists, helpers, good samaritans, doom mongers and men with 2 inch willies will soon be amongst us LTH.
Stand firm, we have heard it all before.

Is it possible to know if the man with the two inches is standing firm?
Or were you describing width not length?

But I do agree, they will be here posting their brilliant well researched points very soon.
I need to remember not to engage with them....I really must....I probably won't.

have to consider it could be the worlds slowest pump and dump.

personally whilst it is nice to see a general drift back up to pre OO levels I think it is at this stage a build of anticipation and a FOMO mentality moving the SP.
It would be nice to think that it is the MF being over subscribed but not getting my hopes up before an RNS there.

Rickierich, not sure where your numbers come from. Would be good to share any calculations and assumptions.
Anything over a pound would be a stunning result for BPC.

OK, so I said it part in jest when we started moving up again but I am pleased to see a SP over 2.5p.
considering the volume of shares that were released as part of the OO at 2.0 it feels like a big gap up.
If we can hold 2.5 till the end of the week without an RNS I for 1 will be a happy camper because if there was limited expectation II's would surely start looking at 20%+ returns on a short term as good value. If we do not see some significant profit taking maybe even the big boys in the OO are planning to stay for 'poop or bust' or they have news we are not yet privy to, but that would be naughty....

pleased to see the LTH question covered off already.
As I have said several times I approve of you, and others like you, who post challenge to the positive views. My only request is that posters provide supporting material or that they are honest enough to be clear it is a personal opinion.
I believe that on this board we have some very bright researchers who between us if given a start will dig out details to back up counter arguments.
Why would we do this? because whilst we want a positive outcome, being armed with more depth of knowledge we can all review our own personal risk levels and act accordingly.
I hold that view for both positive and negative posts. It is just that it is far easier to find supporting links than counter links. At least until there is a negative outcome.

another request for you to remain an active poster on the BB.

Evening Fatal, not sure what I am to take note of, or for that matter why I have been grouped with bonum in that post.
never mind, if the post has got whatever it is off your chest and we can have a touch of civility break out again then no harm no foul. My shoulders are broad enough to let that one wash over me.

But, just for the record I have pulled posters up in the recent past for directing their vent at you rather than at the content of a post. I have stated that you often have valid points, albeit sometimes lost in the way you post. You know, when you are posting from a happy place you are much easier to approve of.

Come on, cast aside the disappointment of historic procrastination and focus on how close we are to an end game. You will soon - with a bit of luck - be a wealthy (wealthier) man on the back of BPC.

volume - we may be up but it is still on relatively low volumes. Will hold off a BOOM with added O's till we are moving 100m + shares a day.
SP holding more than 20% to OO and MF for more than a couple of trading sessions.

you know the type.

The alarm bells will start ringing as soon as (or if) we hit the top winners list.

done.

do I hear 2.5?

Ok maybe not a whale in the water but that is a bigger fish shaped thing than we have seen for a few weeks. A dolphin if you will.

starting to look like 2.2 might get tested today.
thread count can have an impact, as can the choice of liquid used, allegedly.

IK
I genuinely laughed out loud at that. I even played the scene in my head complete with Spike subbing Schrodinger for Pandora.

I keep threatening to go sea fishing, I went out on a lobster boat years ago as an young'un looking to make a few extra £. No, No, No, No, No. Sea, fine, boats, fine, add in gutting mackerel to re-bait the pots and I was as green as Kermit.

Interesting to see the SP move up when we all know there is the mutual fund bit pegged to 2p for the first tranche, could it be that the uptake is stronger than anticipated? Or am I getting ahead of myself and reading more into it than is there?

We are in danger of adopting the JFDI principle of things.

it gets things done, just not always the best way. Better to be doing something and getting it 80% right than 100% idle.

I can confirm that the structures will be drilled. I have a hammer drill all I need is a chuffing long drill bit, a bit of luck and a generator.
What could possibly go wrong?

Fatal there have been many posters on here holding positive or negative views.
None have been proven correct so far.

Those adding a time line to events may well have been proven correct/incorrect. However, that is only on the timeline attributed to the outcome.
I am sure even the most positive person here will stand with you on the view this has taken longer than we would have wanted, but right now all the signs are that we will be drilling this year.

We are sat on Schrodinger's oil field. None of us know with certainty what is in the box until we open it.

The problem with holding a firm negative view is that you have to be correct every time to be correct. Holding a positive view you only have to be correct once.

Gentlemen, Ladies, distinguished guests, please raise a glass, cup or mug, to opening the box and finding out if we were right or wrong.

Cheers Bonum, i'll take the business card of your antique restorer, just in case mind you.

forget lions share....I am looking forward to P_I's share (subject to tax and Mrs P_I's deductions and the grandkids fund) it should be just enough for a small cuba libre - southport rather Bahamas and I say cuba libre, more like a warm vending machine pepsi max.

loving the research Molokai. I second the view on Caribbean Rum served on a beach (watching the sun set)

I don't think that $250m is unrealistic. I was working on £250 - £400m which is greater than the 7x but reflects the overshoot expected, profit taking will eat at that so timing of the profit taking will impact the overshoot. Why higher? because at this stage whilst we are a potential 1 hit wonder if we get black wet at the bottom of the hole our only pay master is the royalty to Govt. My preference all the way has been farm in, I still live in hope of that ahead of first drill but suspect it is more likely now to come in at a higher rate de-risked after the first drill.

I would not be surprised under those conditions to see a return of share holder capital - tax minimised benefit...

here here Bryn and Jim.

regards Fatal and the riceman, Fatal, take a step back from your post, re-read it from a critical persons point of view and consider the way it is worded. You raise some very valid challenges, however, rather than raise them as a direct challenge to the board invite the wisdom and research skills from the board to support a critique.
Riceman, go easy on Fatal, he is a LTH and has some very valid reasons to be critical, even if they are not always supported with or provide reference to the reasons.

I think we are all broad minded enough to accept that the share is still a risk. If it were not then the SP would reflect this and be significantly higher. That said, if, and it is still a big if, but if we get the drill in the ground and hit the mother of all plays then those who have stood over that risk through the years will feel very well rewarded, both financially and emotionally/mentally.

If we drill and find nothing but an empty chamber at least we will still have a pot to relieve ourselves in.