Member Info for PreparationH

MMU installation costs vary wildly. It was reported that CEPSA spent circa $3Million on the installation at San Roque to the Saudi 'never even installed' MMU costing something like $5Million.

All costs that could be rapidly covered in MSAR savings and sales of course!

HF, he's not very good at facts is he?

(Said earlier with great insistance that it was the Maersk Bogor did the original POC trial when it was the Soroe Maersk)

As we saw over the weekendNever let the truth get in the way off an all day ramp!. He's the Master son!

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jtw_cVlmPmE

Smoky!! ..currently!

Its a sizeable lump

https://www.industrialmarinepower.com/hfo-diesel-generator-set-man-18v-3240-8640kw60hz-for-power-plant-14096/

SC: " all we need do is plug one back into the connections that we unplugged it from, a very quick solution to supply and one I'm sure CEPSA are eager to agree to."

No we can't, look at google and other sattelite maps. CEPSA have removed the large hot resid storage tanks they supplied!

SC “I don't need clarification on why MSAR is going commercial after an MSC PoC, I don't care how they've worked it out with Lloyds, insurance etc”

There are other people on the board who might be interested, but we are most apologetic that people are inconveniencing your Holiness by discussing things you don't care about.

Twelve years ago we had a POC on both a Wartsilla AND a MAN B&W engined vessel (albeit on one cylinder of the engines) And where did THAT get us despite his holiness's insistence that the SP would shoot to £5 at that time?!

So much can still happen, at least there are more factors working in our favour this time but savvy investors still need a cautious eye away from the FOMO fantasist!

"MSC could push this by adding in the Leandra V sister ship (already converted to take MSAR)"

Absolute rubbish! It has not.

I'm all for getting the story out there but not by blatantly lying. What is this guy on??

Stickycheeks on full rampathon today I see. Must have a sell order in for sure!

It's on the forum because...

a) there's a high degree of formatting

b)if posted on here, it'd get swamped by a load of rubbish posts of old links by StickyCheeks who doesn't like anyone else giving far more realistic information than themselves. Try finding Burble's last numbers precis post on here from a few days ago!

The forum is 'private in the first place' to, in the words of Brian/Haggis/saville/StickyCheeks himself who set it up, "Get away from the shorters/rampers/nutters on the unmoderated forums". It has been kept that way basically as the mods are unpaid and have lives to live.

I'm sure, if he can find the time, Burble will like last time, be able to precis his new figure on here, with the usual "this is NOT investment advice" caveat.

Thanks

Question 40 in the IM QnA..

The final part of the answer to a question about prospective customers by projected revenue impact.

We have a letter of intent signed by OCP declaring their interest in up to 10ktpa supply of MSAR.

I queried this low figure with the company, the response..

A response came back sharply..

"That’s a typo, it should be up to 10kt per month – will get that amended."

Burble had better get some new numbers in the mixer! :)

TOMCO = Totally Outta Money Co.

The 'Six holes' are to bolt down a signpost that says "RF Amplifiers for sale, please give generously"

RPG7: "Now a nation of short attention spanners who want to go to bed before they get up. Long term holders forget it. They prefer a diet of crumbs rather than chunks."

Absolutely spot on, it's why AIM and british entrepreneurship is screwed!

"Wondering if the yankees have noticed QED today"

Fang, unlikely given this poor reporting... https://www.defenseworld.net/2024/11/24/quadrise-lonqed-stock-price-up-9-4-still-a-buy.html

"Quadrise Plc, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, markets, and sells emulsion fuels for use in power generation, industrial, marine diesel engines, and steam generation applications in the United Kingdom...."

Mabe if Utah had got a mention?....

Mad

From what I can see, you seem to be the only one that's moaning today!

Good work on the new Burble Numbers on the Forum Burble. ...very interesting and eye opening! Shame the format wouldn't work on here.

..Usual cautiously optimistic caveats apply of course!

Https://reneweconomy.com.au/lng-imports-are-a-lot-dirtier-than-previously-thought-and-little-better-than-heavy-fuel-oil/

A new report authored by Energy and Environmental Research Associates, on behalf of Transport and Energy (T&E), shows that LNG imports to the European Union (EU) from major suppliers like the US, Qatar, Russia, and Algeria are nearly as polluting as the heavy fuel oil companies are trying to replace.

Deaf to the point of arrogance!

SC, What part of "I don't disagree with you" do you not understand??!!

I WAS at the AGM!

Trolls don't attend AGM's SC. Bedsit door's blocked by pizza boxes!

Can't disagree with anything Rev.Brian has preached this morning.

As was said yersterday to me by a NED who came over to personally chat .."The company is now in a far far better place than it was this time next year"