Member Info for PJT12

The market is telling us everything we need to know about Nano. Anybody who cannot find umpteen better opportunities out there really should not be dabbling.

HH, "I hope for a court case...."
At least we know there's a chance they'll bottle one and opt for a settlement :)

@NGR, "I’m trying to see the settlement as a defining moment that removes uncertainty and now look forward to receiving the commercial orders in the next 12 months."

Surely, based upon Nanoco's track record to date (and this is genuinely how I feel), the greatest "uncertainty" lay not in the finances but in the "commercial orders" of which you speak, those likely being yet more of the "jam" we have been promised without delivery throughout recent years.

"Now we know that there are no imminent commercialisation deals...." HH, some of have realised this shocking truth well before "now", as I think you may well have done deep down.

NGR1616: "Before commercialisation"?.......Optimistic, even by your "rose tinted", overly protective company views of the past year.

He'll be lucky to be able to "walk" at all if some of the shareholders have their way! Is it any wonder that quite a few on here have arrived in the mistaken belief that NANO is an AIM company.

"I do recall Nanoco saying in the past that their current generation of QD's were a match or better than anything out there."
They also told us "We're going to court!" Yet more jam tomorrow, I fear.

Couldn't help but think Wandisco whilst reading today's LSE midday update: "Credit Suisse was under the cosh as it was hit with a lawsuit by US investors alleging it overstated its financial prospects to shareholders.

The suit was filed by the Rosen Law Firm, which specialises in representing individual shareholders, and claims the bank made "materially false and misleading statements" in its 2021 annual report."

Gotta be honest, James, I've often wondered if you and Briggs are the same person, thus using that alias to less obviously deramp.

IMO it will happen by the end of this month, as stated, having crossed the i's and signed-up now the budget is out of the way. That said, AIM is always a blimmin' lottery and needs to be much better regulated, again imo.

This wouldn't have helped - moreso yesterday. What was Stuart expecting just ahead of the budget? A last minute rewrite from the Treasury?

Points taken, JB, but you might want to hold-off until you've checked the budget holds no nasty surprises on the tax fronts.

More banking concerns (Credit Suisse) across the global markets.

"Baz ... there may be something to cheer us up in the results presentation".

Why should there be, any more than there was in the previous "jam tomorrow" snake-oil offerings? At least we had our Samsung hopes to hang onto at that point.

I'm still with Dick in his suggestion that the other parties may well be waiting to check there are no further govt nasties contained in the budget before signing anything. That makes sense to me but this is still a punt for me.

So, you 'in' or 'out' at present because I don't get your reason for spending the time you do undermining it if it's the latter?

"Dick I’ve seen your type on almost every AIM share".

JB, that's a bit rich coming from you, especially bearing in mind your constant attempts to undermine a share which you profess to have no interest in? If ever there was a "type".

Timster, you still into that stuff? And doesn't that restraining order count for anything? ;-)

Fair points and I get that.

"So what has this got to do with Avacta?"

Nothing, other than the fact that he's featured in so many posts on here previously and the story's an interesting one, imo......Apologies. Rest assured, I'll get back to bashing him in future.