Scancell founder says the company is ready to commercialise novel medicines to counteract cancer. Watch the video here.
basil1717: you got off very lightly here. You frankly deserve a barrage of insults. Did you really think that we hadn't heard of Surescreen?
Get back to NCYT and ride that wave. But please remind me which way you're going and which way we're going?
I'm re-hashing a suggestion I made months ago. I know that I put it forward, but in my advancing years, I can't recall whether it got slated, agreed with or largely ignored. I can't be bothered to go through all my posts, find it and see what happened. Then again, it might be well received this time.
What the LFT needs is to be unreadable, by eye that is. It needs 4 or 5 or 6 or so lines on the strip. Not just positive and control. You need for people to do the test, have a line that only pops up if someone has shoved it up their nose - there must be something common to everyone's mucosa that we can design an Affimer to bind to. Add to the mix a random number of other things that'll make lines on the strip and of course the magic one that binds to the S1.
Johnny public shoves the swab up their nose and runs the test. A bunch of lines pop up at various locations. They look at it and genuinely go, "So... have I got it?", so they take a photo and upload it and wait for their answer.
They want to get into the match/concert/theatre etc, so they want to take the test. They know that if they don't shove it up their nose the crucial mucosal thingy won't fire and the system will report back that they've tried to cheat, so they don't. Central government and perhaps more importantly, the event door staff find out if you have it and either let you in or you go home and isolate.
I think it is a good theoretical idea, but perhaps unworkable in practise. Thoughts?
Totally agree, but Wyn was interpreting the charts and charts don't consider the odds of receiving news.
People might not like the use of charts to predict when if a good time to buy/sell, especially if it doesn't fit with their preconceived ideas and biases. But they more often than not have a benefit, else why would anyone do/use them?
Have I lost my mind? Am I standing up for Wyn?
If I understand his sentiment, from a trading point of view - and it must be stressed it is from a trading point of view, the charts suggest that tomorrow won't be a good day to buy.
But we all know that charts don't and can't predict news about to drop. Yes, from a LTH point of view, tomorrow is an excellent day, as we want to ensure that we buy in before the news drops and surf the whole of the wave and get the whole multi-bag.
But if all you're interested in is catching the little waves and take the odd percent here and there, then you're probably not going to see much, if any rise tomorrow. So, if you're a trader, there is no particular reason to buy tomorrow (iho).
Well, I've been in since 1965, back when the SP was three and six.
Where have all these people who have been in for all this time been over the last twelve months? How have they been silent through 2...1...2...1...?